Re: Over configuration

From: Nathan Pease <pease.nathan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:45:20 -0800

I certainly would not do this for every task or even very many tasks. But in
certain situations it would be faster to just do both rather than go ask the
proctor or think about it for to long.

I guise the bottom line is can you loose points for over configuration
assuming that you also got the task done correctly.

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Scott M Vermillion <
scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com> wrote:

> I'm jealous of anyone fast enough to even able to contemplate such a thing!
> ;-)
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:46 , Nathan Pease wrote:
>
> What is everyones thoughts on over configuration. If I have a task and I
>> see
>> two possible config options should I just turn on both if it doesn't hurt.
>>
>> Example task: Do not allow the other hosts on the segment to intercept
>> routing protocol updates between R1 and R2.
>>
>> Solution: Unicast updates or MD5 authentication.
>>
>> Would it hurt to just do both knowing that one of them will be correct and
>> the other won't hurt anything?
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jan 04 2011 - 12:45:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART