Yes, but what happens when police rate is applied on physical interface ? Is
it the same as police cir ?
In my lab:
R1----(F0/0)R2(F0/1)----R3
On R2 there are two policy-maps to limit icmp to 1%:
policy-map TEST0
class TEST0
police cir percent 1
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
policy-map TEST1
class TEST1
police rate percent 1
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
TEST0 is applied on input of F0/0
TEST1 is applied on input of F0/1
Now, when I ping R3 from R1 and R1 from R3 results are excactly the same.
Are then "police cir percent" and "police rate percent" THE SAME ? My test
tells me that they behave the same way, is there a difference in the way
they work inside the router or even not that ?
On 21 December 2010 14:28, Deepak Ahuja <deeps.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Its a clear reference to COPP not General Policing
>
> HTH
> Deepak
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What for is "police rate" ? There is very little information about this
> > command. Even Cisco mentions it only twice in a 1100 page QOS
> configuration
> > guide 12.4:
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/12_4t/qos_12_4t_book.pdf
> >
> > According to this document:
> >
> > CISCO-CLASS-BASED-QOS-MIB was extended to manage control plane QoS
> policies,
> > and the police rate command was introduced to support traffic policing on
> > the basis of packets per second for control plane traffic.
> >
> > Taking into consideration that "police rate" is meant to manage control
> > plane, what it does when it is attached to physical interface (not
> > control-plane) ?
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Deepak Ahuja
> CCIE#19545(R&S/SP)
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 22 2010 - 00:00:54 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 09:37:49 ART