Re: OT: Cisco NAC

Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.

Content preview: Well So far Cisco NAC is the only solution out there which
   covers most deployment scenarios or is holistic. And probably is the reason
   for so many boxes. However u can deploy nac with Just NAC Manager and NAC
   server and expand the solution as required. ONe needs to understand the Clients
   network to make any recommendations. [...]

Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
Received: from server15.hostcats.com (server15.hostcats.com
  [68.67.68.15]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
  id oBL4YrCM022214 GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:34:53 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by
  server15.hostcats.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69)
  (envelope-from <v.shekhar_at_globalassurance.net>) id 1PUtw9-0001Dh-WF;
  Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:34:58 -0500
Received: from 124.171.1.150 ([124.171.1.150]) by globalassurance.net
  (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:34:57 -0500
Message-ID: <20101220233457.10236cqz7e3jlbw1_at_globalassurance.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:34:57 -0500
From: Vijay Shekhar <v.shekhar_at_globalassurance.net>
To: dhackdheolu_at_gmail.com
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT: Cisco NAC
References: <894234530-1292896648-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-656961930-_at_b26.c19.bise7.blackberry>
In-Reply-To: <894234530-1292896648-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-656961930-_at_b26.c19.bise7.blackberry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
  format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it
  with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server15.hostcats.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - groupstudy.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - globalassurance.net

Well So far Cisco NAC is the only solution out there which covers most
deployment scenarios or is holistic. And probably is the reason for so
many boxes.
However u can deploy nac with Just NAC Manager and NAC server and
expand the solution as required.
ONe needs to understand the Clients network to make any recommendations.

DO get in touch offline if you need any more assistance. I was a NAC
SME in Cisco for five years.

-Vijay Shekhar
CCIE(sec)#17589/CISSP/RHCE.
http://au.linkedin.com/in/vshekhar

>
> Content preview: Hi all, I met a client that wants to deploy a NAC solution
> but is troubled about the "too many boxes (components) of a full
> blown Cisco
> NAC deployment." Please can you guys make a case for or against Cisco NAC.
> [...]

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Dec 20 2010 - 23:34:57 ART