Re: why to stack switches when i can use trunks to extend l2

From: Robert Kimble <hoodooman21_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:55:54 -0600

Also, LAG groups can span multiple physical chassis in the stack providing
better redundancy.

-Bobby

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Satinder Singh <satinder.iitd_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> If we are connecting the switches though backplane .... we are saving the
> ports.
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Tony Schaffran (GS) <
> groupstudy_at_cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
>
> > More bandwidth when you stack the backplane and you are not using
> valuable
> > ports.
> >
> > Tony Schaffran
> > Sr. Network Consultant
> > CCIE #11071
> > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > ehtesham ali
> > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 6:49 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: OT: why to stack switches when i can use trunks to extend l2
> > network
> >
> > hi group ,
> > ignore my ignorance
> >
> > why to stack switches when i can use trunks to extend l2 network?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Satinder Singh
> mobile 09980075998
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Dec 20 2010 - 09:55:54 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 09:37:49 ART