Well Done Guys
Great achievement, and just goes to show that the TS isn't all that
intimidating if you have prepared with your own break fix scenarios.
You guys are the next to pass since my exam aswell because i note
Charlie is 27704 and Artem is 27705! (I am 27703 from Brussels!)
Major congrats again, and start enjoying your time.
On 14 December 2010 05:11, Joseph L. Brunner <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>>Before going to the proctor made 3 different versions of the question in your head and be prepared to hear "I can't tell you it", "do what the question says".
>
> Don't go to the proctor AT ALL unless there is power or equipment failure until the last 90 minutes of the lab. Or he will Cuckhold you into the group of losers
> Who come to help every day 10 minutes into the lab and try to be his "buddy".
>
> Act serious and look serious and the upperclassmen won't make you M*sterbate in the bathroom (old story a guy from India told me)!
>
> -Joe
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of oghenetejiri.groupstudy_at_gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:08 AM
> To: Artem Nedoshepa; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Passed the lab, some tips: "a week before the lab".
>
> Congrats MAN!!!!!!
> Sent from my BlackBerry. smartphone from Zain Nigeria
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Artem Nedoshepa <artem.nedoshepa_at_gmail.com>
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:03:27
> To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Reply-To: Artem Nedoshepa <artem.nedoshepa_at_gmail.com>
> Subject: Passed the lab, some tips: "a week before the lab".
>
> First of all I want to say thank you guys, all and each of you contributed
> in my number: CCIE#27705
>
> I'd like to share my "story".
>
> 1.5 months ago I took the lab in RTP and failed the TS but passed the
> configs. I was so confident about the TS that I thought I'd have an hour
> spare time. When I got to the 3rd ticket I realized that I'm going to need
> that "spare hour". During the TS it felt like the clock was going 1.5 times
> faster, no bathroom, no going to a breakroom. (in RTP the bathroom is kind
> of far, not like in SJC - across the hole.) The config section took me over
> 5.5 hours, I had about 20 minutes to verify. All this 6 hours I was worried
> that I had only 8 tkt solved and most-likely some of them are incorrect, but
> I was trying to stay as positive as I could be. On the plane home overall
> feeling was that I failed both sections, because I didn't have enough time
> to verify the configs and not enough tickets solved. The next day I got the
> results and I was ready to see "FAIL".
>
> I booked the next attempt in 6 weeks in SJC since the RTP was booked until
> February. I took it easy for a week or so, than started building a TS
> scenarios with 30+ devices and all possible trouble tickets. A friend of
> mine Charlie (who passed as well) and I used the approach : "To become a
> criminal you must think like a criminal". You'll be surprised how much you
> can learn by "breaking" stuff for your buddy. So what we did is we made a
> .net topology in dynamips with 30 + routers, put some preconfigs (basic
> routing, BGP, MPLS etc..), we also included almost all possible "ip
> services" and other "stuff" that you see on the blueprint. Each of us made
> 2 full TS scenarios for each other. By a "full TS scenarios" I mean 16+
> tickets, and we made the tickets a bit harder that we experienced in the
> lab. A week before the lab each of us had 2 "Super-sessions", 2 hours TS + 6
> hours configs, (let your friend to pick the lab for your, whichever vendor
> you use). These "super-sessions" with harder that in reality TS helped a
> lot (we did it twice with one day delay). I'd recommend not to touch the
> keyboard 2 days before the lab.
>
> SJC, the TS session started, 10 minutes passed 2 or 3 tickets done, power
> outage :), believe it or not, I didn't worried at all, I went and made some
> tea (another tip, don't drink coffee if you don't usually drink it, it
> WON"T make you smarter/faster), went to the bathroom. It took the proctors
> 20 minutes to fix the issue, we got lucky - the configs were saved but I
> verified each solved ticket, just to make sure. I finished the TS with 30
> minutes left. The clock was going 0.8 times slower this time, everything was
> like in a slow motion, I don't know maybe because our TS was too hardcore
> than the real one. The config part was fun, went to the proctors like 20
> times, it wasn't clear, looks like somebody from another planet wrote it.
> (my first attempt the lab was very clear, I went to the proctor only 3-4
> times). Before going to the proctor made 3 different versions of the
> question in your head and be prepared to hear "I can't tell you it", "do
> what the question says". Take a moment and really think how to rephrase the
> same question, show the proctor that you know the "stuff" and you just need
> some small details to make the right decision.
>
> For preparation I used 4x3550 and dynamips, I made a little blog about it
> ccie4you.info , for stuff that don't work on 3550 or Dynamips rented a real
> rack a couple of times. Use SRS twice a day, I used Anki, so far it's the
> best I've seen. (My anki deck has like 1300 cards).
>
>
> Again, thank you all.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Dec 14 2010 - 06:55:59 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 09:37:49 ART