Re: Route Leaking MPLS VPN Scenario

simple diagramin 1 line

[Access Layer Router] <<<<<Fa0/0<<>>>>>Fa0/0>>>[ VRF-Lite CE]<<(VRF
Test)<<<Fa0/1<<<>>>>>Fa0/1>>>(VRF Test)>>[MPLS PE]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Remote
Site CE in VRF Test

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:57 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> your diagram came out all garbled but i had this link to route leaking
> bookmarked:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080231a3e.shtml
>
> maybe it will help out...
>
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:45 PM, SD <networker.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>>
>> ______________________ __________________
>> _________________
>> | Access Layer route r | Fa0/0 Fa0/0| VRF-Lite CE |
>> fa1/1 fa1/1 | MPLS PE Router |
>> |_____________________|------------------------|_________________| VRF
>> test-----VRF test|_________________|
>>
>>
>> Access Layer Router has loopback 1.1.1.1 which should be advertised in vrf
>> test on PE in ebgp, I have ebgp running between CE and PE and CE has an
>> interface configured in vrf test as this is a vrf lite scenario, there is
>> a
>> static route in global routing table of CE for network 1.1.1.1 pointing
>> towards access layer router, now i want to reach 1.1.1.1 without
>> configuring
>> VRF test on CE's interface to access layer router.
>>
>>
>> How we can achieve this using route leaking from global roiuting table to
>> VRF routing table.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 24 2010 - 22:02:43 ART