RE: EIGRP and eBGP

From: David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:07:16 -0500

Administrative Distance will win out. eBGP 20, EIGRP 90, OSPF 110, RIP 120,
ISIS 115.

Couldn't remember ISIS so found this. It includes all of the External as
well.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094195
.shtml

--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Bilal Hansrod
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:01 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: EIGRP and eBGP
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> If a router running two protocol EIGRP and eBGP and same route learned
> via both routing protocol, will I see eBGP routes installed in routing
> table. (no redistribution configured)
> 
> I can lab this scenario, but just wanted to clarify understanding. I've
> read somewhere that eBGP routes are not installed in routing table to
> prevent huge BGP prefixes into routing table , unless you issue magical
> command. I'm really confused whether it is only required when
> redistribution is configured.
> 
> I apologies if this doesn't make sense?
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Bilal Hansrod
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Nov 23 2010 - 18:07:16 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 05 2010 - 22:14:56 ART