There are four other attributes that are taken into account before MED:
1. Weight
2. Local preference
3. AS path
4. Origin
MED is an extremely weak metric in BGP. if you want to override
behavior using MED, just change it.
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:28, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps I was not clear then... > > I am an ISP (AS12, R1, R2) and you are a client (AS34, R3, R4). > I, the ISP do not like the idea that you (the client) tell me how to route > packets on my network. I want to ignore MED you may send me from R3 or R4. > > B B B B AS12 > R1----------R2 > |B B B B B B B B B B | > |B B B B B B B B B B | > R4----------R3 > B B B B AS34 > > This is not a real life example, I am only extending a lab from my workbook. > In the lab I was asked to make sure that all traffic to AS34 uses link > R2-R3. The solution is to set metric higher than 0 on R4 toward R1. I am now > adding requirement to ignore this route manipulation and confgure > accordingly routers in AS12. > > > On 21 November 2010 22:21, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote: >> >> Just curious... What would be the reason to keep it if you are going >> to ignore it? >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:16, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > Thanks for your answer but it does not answer my question. The question >> > was >> > if it is possible to ignore a MED instead of setting metric=0. >> > >> > On 21 November 2010 20:29, Zack (Doc) <zack_at_tnan.net> wrote: >> > >> >> MED should only be compared (by default) when it's coming from the same >> >> AS. >> >> B Why do you want to ignore it? B Why is setting via RM not clean? B I >> >> just >> >> told my carrier to ignore my MED (cause they are using >> >> "always-compare-med") >> >> and I told them to put this on their existing RM >> >> >> >> route-map CUSTOMER_X_INBOUND permit 1 >> >> B set metric=0 >> >> B continue >> >> >> >> It's just that easy. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 17:20, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hello Experts, >> >> > How to ignore MED information received from neigbouring EBGP router ? >> >> > I >> >> can >> >> > set metric = 0 via a route-map but this is not as clean as ignoring >> >> > an >> >> > information would be >> > >> > >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> > >> > _______________________________________________________________________ >> > Subscription information may be found at: >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Nov 22 2010 - 05:46:24 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 05 2010 - 22:14:56 ART