Re: OT: Juniper MX80 vs Cisco ASR1002

Hey Emir, bare in mind that MX series got some issues in the STM DPCs,
which is the width of the card, its double width, consuming 2 slots from he
box

MR Combs, its OT as a subject, and trust me most of OT mails are real world
issues/experience that are very important, cuz trust me CCIE as a
certificate is not enough in our strong challenging Multi-Vendor field.

Thanks & B.regards
Ahmed Elhoussiny,2x CCIE# 21988 (R&S-SP)
Network Consultant & Cisco Academy Instructor

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:59 PM, <mwcombs_at_comcast.net> wrote:

> START OF RANT!!!!
>
>
>
> YO AHMED
>
>
>
> I THOUGHT this was an avenue for CCIE study topics and or related
> questions? WAS IT NOT? OR didn't you read the disclaimer before you signed
> up
>
>
>
> AM I missing something here? There's already enough smap related to off
> topic subjects. All agree.....
>
>
>
> End of Rant!!!
>
>
>
> - Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph L. Brunner" <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>
> To: "Ahmed Elhoussiny" <aelhoussiny_at_gmail.com>, "emir d souza" <
> emir979_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:37:45 PM
> Subject: RE: OT: Juniper MX80 vs Cisco ASR1002
>
> >as a Cisco techie I'm definitely biased towards the ASRs.
>
>
> The clue is actually right here in front of our eyes all along.
>
> If you are the one (or your organization) that will be engineering and
> supporting the device you may have to Cisco if that is your skill set.
>
> Don't hide the total cost of ownership from the client. As a professional
> consultant, I'm often asked why we don't recommend unix/linux OPENSOURCE
> applications.
> I remind them...
>
> Microsoft
> $65,000 systems engineer, $65,000 software
>
> Linux/Unix
> $130,000 systems engineer, $less for software (still not free)
>
> If you are going to have to waste valuable time and efforts to support the
> Juniper platform then you must consider this.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ahmed Elhoussiny
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:26 PM
> To: emir d souza
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: OT: Juniper MX80 vs Cisco ASR1002
>
> 1- QOS Arch inside the BOX
> 2- Multicast replication mechanizm
> 3- Capacity, BW, MPPS
> 4- kind of cards & interfaces. (SIPs & DPCs)
>
>
>
> Thanks & B.regards
> Ahmed Elhoussiny,2x CCIE# 21988 (R&S-SP)
> Network Consultant & Cisco Academy Instructor
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:12 AM, emir d souza <emir979_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Can anyone help me out? I'm faced with a question from a client, and as a
> > Cisco techie I'm definitely biased towards the ASRs.
> > Can anyone help me mount an argument against the MX80, spoiler of spoils?
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net