Re: Juniper MX80 vs Cisco ASR1002

From: emir d souza <emir979_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:31:05 +1300

Haha...I think IBM has decided to go with blade networks, and HP has HTC
sorry H3C, one of those that come without the touchscreen and gps :P

Anyway, any tips on this guys?

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Joseph L. Brunner <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com
> wrote:

> How much longer will Juniper be an independent company?
>
> And does this company want to be an IBM or HP routing customer? (YIKES)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> emir d souza
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:12 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: OT: Juniper MX80 vs Cisco ASR1002
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Can anyone help me out? I'm faced with a question from a client, and as a
> Cisco techie I'm definitely biased towards the ASRs.
> Can anyone help me mount an argument against the MX80, spoiler of spoils?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Nov 11 2010 - 11:31:05 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 05 2010 - 22:14:56 ART