Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS from Manaf Al Oqlah on 2010-10-28 (Ccielab archives 10/2010)

From: Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:56:48 +0300

PE01#show mpls ldp discovery
Local LDP Identifier:
    1.1.1.1:0
    Discovery Sources:
    Interfaces:
        GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (ldp): xmit/recv
            LDP Id: 2.2.2.2:0
    Targeted Hellos:
        1.1.1.1 -> 2.2.2.2 (ldp): active/passive, xmit/recv
            LDP Id: 2.2.2.2:0
PE01#show mpls ldp ne
PE01#show mpls ldp neighbor
    Peer LDP Ident: 2.2.2.2:0; Local LDP Ident 1.1.1.1:0
        TCP connection: 2.2.2.2.23803 - 1.1.1.1.646
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 11/10; Downstream
        Up time: 00:03:21
        LDP discovery sources:
          GigabitEthernet1/1/1, Src IP addr: 10.0.0.2
          Targeted Hello 1.1.1.1 -> 2.2.2.2, active, passive
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          2.2.2.2 10.0.0.2

PE02#sh mpls ldp discovery
Local LDP Identifier:
    2.2.2.2:0
    Discovery Sources:
    Interfaces:
        GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (ldp): xmit/recv
            LDP Id: 1.1.1.1:0
    Targeted Hellos:
        2.2.2.2 -> 1.1.1.1 (ldp): active/passive, xmit/recv
            LDP Id: 1.1.1.1:0
PE02#sh mpls ldp ne
PE02#sh mpls ldp neighbor
    Peer LDP Ident: 1.1.1.1:0; Local LDP Ident 2.2.2.2:0
        TCP connection: 1.1.1.1.646 - 2.2.2.2.23803
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 12/13; Downstream
        Up time: 00:05:00
        LDP discovery sources:
          GigabitEthernet1/1/1, Src IP addr: 10.0.0.1
          Targeted Hello 2.2.2.2 -> 1.1.1.1, active, passive
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          1.1.1.1 192.168.30.30 10.0.0.1

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:30 PM
To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
Cc: "karthik thatikonda" <get2explore_at_gmail.com>; "Shaughn Smith"
<maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>; "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>; "Elias
Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS

> Can you send the output of "show mpls ldp discovery" and "show mpls ldp
> nei".
>
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:17, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have tried different scenario. I configured xconnect on routed port
>> instead of switchport, but still have the same problem. the vc is up but
>> noc
>> traffic between CE1 & CE2
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:11 PM
>> To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>> Cc: "karthik thatikonda" <get2explore_at_gmail.com>; "Shaughn Smith"
>> <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>; "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>;
>> "Elias
>> Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>
>>> Well, then something is wrong, but ... the information you're
>>> providing doesn't make up for much troubleshooting fodder.
>>>
>>> One question though - are you sure you can do xconnect from SVI on
>>> 3750? Perhaps you need to do it from a subinterface, as is the case
>>> with 6500/7600 with LAN line cards.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>>
>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>>
>>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:39, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> no ma addresses and no arp are being learned!
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> From: "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:01 PM
>>>> To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> Cc: "karthik thatikonda" <get2explore_at_gmail.com>; "Shaughn Smith"
>>>> <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>; "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>;
>>>> "Elias
>>>> Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>>
>>>>> Manaf - how are your ARP entries? Are MAC addresses being learned?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>>
>>>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>>>>
>>>>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>>>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:25, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B 1 B * B * B *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: karthik thatikonda
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 6:28 PM
>>>>>> To: Shaughn Smith
>>>>>> Cc: Manaf Al Oqlah ; srinivas pv ; Elias Chari ; Group Study
>>>>>> Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you do a traceroute on CE01 and see where it is stopping?.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karthik.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B Did you reload the devices. Had the same issue once and a reload
>>>>>> sorted
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B Sent from my iPhone 4
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B On 27 Oct 2010, at 4:17 PM, "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B > yes received this debugging messages after putting deb ip icmp or
>>>>>> deb
>>>>>> ip
>>>>>> packets
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B > CE01#debug ip icmp
>>>>>> B > CE01#debug ip packet
>>>>>> B > CE01#ping 192.168.0.2
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B > Type escape sequence to abort.
>>>>>> B > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.2, timeout is 2
>>>>>> seconds:
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, sending
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>>>> sendself
>>>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.699: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, sending
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>>>> sendself
>>>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, sending
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>>>> sendself
>>>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, sending
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>>>> sendself
>>>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, sending
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>>>> sendself
>>>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>>>> B > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>>>>>> B > CE01#
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B > --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> B > From: "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
>>>>>> B > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:11 PM
>>>>>> B > To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>>>> B > Cc: "Elias Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study"
>>>>>> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>>>> B > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B >> These outputs looks fine.
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >> Did you get 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on both CEs?
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >> This may give some idea.
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >> Thanks,
>>>>>> B >> Srinivas
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>>>> <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >>> here you go:
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table
>>>>>> B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B
>>>>>> Outgoing B Next
>>>>>> Hop
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B
>>>>>> interface
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> 17 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> Gi1/1/1
>>>>>> B >>> 10.0.0.2
>>>>>> B >>> 18 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(100) B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> Vl100 point2point
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table detail
>>>>>> B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B
>>>>>> Outgoing B Next
>>>>>> Hop
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B
>>>>>> interface
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> 17 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> Gi1/1/1
>>>>>> B >>> 10.0.0.2
>>>>>> B >>> B B B B MAC/Encaps=14/14, MRU=1504, Label Stack{}
>>>>>> B >>> B B B B 002334947D42001DE63D1F428847
>>>>>> B >>> B B B B No output feature configured
>>>>>> B >>> 18 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(100) B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> Vl100 point2point
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> B B B B MAC/Encaps=0/0, MRU=0, Label Stack{}
>>>>>> B >>> B B B B No output feature configured
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> *From:* Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>
>>>>>> B >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:05 PM
>>>>>> B >>> *To:* srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
>>>>>> B >>> *Cc:* Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> ; Group
>>>>>> Study<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>>>> B >>> *Subject:* Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> you are probably right and it looks right based on the fact
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> PEs
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> B >>> connected back to back. But I am curious about the fact that on
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> 7200
>>>>>> B >>> platform the command also displays the Tunnel label: imp-null,
>>>>>> see
>>>>>> output
>>>>>> B >>> below, whilst on the ME3750 it does not. I wonder, is this
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> B >>> how the me3750 displays the output of the command or is it
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> B >>> implicit-null is not there?
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> Manaf, I would apprecuate it if you send the output of: sh mpls
>>>>>> B >>> forwarding-table, it will help me understand a bit better the
>>>>>> me3750.
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> This is what you get on the 7200
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls forwarding-table
>>>>>> B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B
>>>>>> Outgoing B Next
>>>>>> Hop
>>>>>> B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B
>>>>>> interface
>>>>>> B >>> 19 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> Se2/2
>>>>>> B >>> point2point
>>>>>> B >>> 23 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(111) B B B B 860 B B B B
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> none point2point
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
>>>>>> B >>> Local interface: Fa0/0 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up
>>>>>> B >>> B Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 111, VC status: up
>>>>>> B >>> B B Output interface: Se2/2, imposed label stack {23}
>>>>>> B >>> B B Preferred path: not configured
>>>>>> B >>> B B Default path: active
>>>>>> B >>> B B Tunnel label: imp-null, next hop point2point
>>>>>> B >>> B Create time: 00:19:56, last status change time: 00:19:05
>>>>>> B >>> B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
>>>>>> B >>> B B MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote 23
>>>>>> B >>> B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>>>> B >>> B B MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
>>>>>> B >>> B B Remote interface description:
>>>>>> B >>> B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>>>>> B >>> B VC statistics:
>>>>>> B >>> B B packet totals: receive 26, send 25
>>>>>> B >>> B B byte totals: B receive 7206, send 7144
>>>>>> B >>> B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> On 27 October 2010 14:20, srinivas pv
>>>>>> <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>>> Since PEs are connected back-to-back, I do not think any
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> LDP
>>>>>> B >>>> here.
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> Also VC labels are setup properly.
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> On PE1:
>>>>>> B >>>> > B B packet totals: receive 0, send 5 B <<<<< receive
>>>>>> counters
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> B >>>> incrementing
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 0, send 630
>>>>>> B >>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> On PE2:
>>>>>> B >>>> > B VC statistics:
>>>>>> B >>>> > B B packet totals: receive 5, send 0 B <<<<< send counters
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> B >>>> incrementing
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 540, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> You may need to enable 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on CEs
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> may
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> B >>>> some ideas.
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> B >>>> Srinivas
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Elias Chari
>>>>>> <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>> check to make sure LDP (not targeted) works ok and that you
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> label
>>>>>> B >>>>> to
>>>>>> B >>>>> reach the remote PE loopback address.
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>> On 27 October 2010 13:24, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>> > ########### PE01 ###########
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > PE01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Interworking type is Ethernet
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {18}
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Preferred path: not configured
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Default path: active
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Next hop: 10.0.0.2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Create time: 00:22:03, last status change time: 00:07:53
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Targeted Hello: 1.1.1.1(LDP Id) -> 2.2.2.2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Status TLV support (local/remote) B : enabled/not
>>>>>> supported
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Label/status state machine B B B B :
>>>>>> established,
>>>>>> LruRru
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local dataplane B status rcvd: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local B LDP TLV B B status sent: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last remote LDP TLV B B status rcvd: not sent
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B MPLS VC labels: local 20, remote 18
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Remote interface description:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B VC statistics:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet totals: receive 0, send 5
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 0, send 630
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > PE01#sh run int g1/1/2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Building configuration...
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes
>>>>>> B >>>>> > !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B description To CE01
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000
>>>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > ###### PE02 ############
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > PE02#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Interworking type is Ethernet
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {20}
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Preferred path: not configured
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Default path: active
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Next hop: 10.0.0.1
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Create time: 00:21:35, last status change time: 00:09:38
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Status TLV support (local/remote) B : enabled/not
>>>>>> supported
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Label/status state machine B B B B :
>>>>>> established,
>>>>>> LruRru
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local dataplane B status rcvd: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local B LDP TLV B B status sent: no fault
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last remote LDP TLV B B status rcvd: not sent
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B MPLS VC labels: local 18, remote 20
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B Remote interface description:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B VC statistics:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet totals: receive 5, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 540, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > PE02#sh run int g1/1/2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Building configuration...
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes
>>>>>> B >>>>> > !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B description to CE01
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000
>>>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > ########### CE01 ############
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > CE01#sh run int g1/0/25
>>>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B description to PE01
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>>>> B >>>>> > !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > CE01#sh run int vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > interface Vlan100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > ######### CE02 ###########
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > CE02#sh run int g1/1/1
>>>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B description to PE02
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000
>>>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > CE02#sh run int vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > interface Vlan100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > From: srinivas pv
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:42 PM
>>>>>> B >>>>> > To: Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Cc: Group Study
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Could you give following details
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > On both PEs:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > show mpls l2 vc detail
>>>>>> B >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to CE>
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > On both CEs:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to PE>
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Srinivas
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>>>> <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>>>> B >>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Hi,
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> below.
>>>>>> B >>>>> > everything
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from
>>>>>> CE01
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B PC01---CE01---PE01---PE02---CE02---PC02
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B I have applied the following configuration on PE01 & PE02
>>>>>> ES
>>>>>> ports
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B interface loopback 0
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B description to PE02
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B mpls ip
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B description to CE01
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B interface vlan 100
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B xconnect 2.2.2.2 100 encapsulation mpls
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B where could me my problem!
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Regards,
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > B http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> B >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> B >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> B >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> B >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>>
>>>>>> B >>>>
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>>
>>>>>> B >>> --
>>>>>> B >>> Regards,
>>>>>> B >>> Elias
>>>>>> B >>> CCIE#17354
>>>>>> B >>> Tel: +44 794 386 6320
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> B >>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> B >> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> B >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> B >
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> B > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> B Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> B http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 15:56:48 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART