Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS

I have tried different scenario. I configured xconnect on routed port
instead of switchport, but still have the same problem. the vc is up but noc
traffic between CE1 & CE2
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:11 PM
To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
Cc: "karthik thatikonda" <get2explore_at_gmail.com>; "Shaughn Smith"
<maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>; "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>; "Elias
Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS

> Well, then something is wrong, but ... the information you're
> providing doesn't make up for much troubleshooting fodder.
>
> One question though - are you sure you can do xconnect from SVI on
> 3750? Perhaps you need to do it from a subinterface, as is the case
> with 6500/7600 with LAN line cards.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:39, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>> no ma addresses and no arp are being learned!
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:01 PM
>> To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>> Cc: "karthik thatikonda" <get2explore_at_gmail.com>; "Shaughn Smith"
>> <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>; "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>;
>> "Elias
>> Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>
>>> Manaf - how are your ARP entries? Are MAC addresses being learned?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>>
>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>>
>>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:25, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> B 1 B * B * B *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: karthik thatikonda
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 6:28 PM
>>>> To: Shaughn Smith
>>>> Cc: Manaf Al Oqlah ; srinivas pv ; Elias Chari ; Group Study
>>>> Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you do a traceroute on CE01 and see where it is stopping?.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Karthik.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> B Did you reload the devices. Had the same issue once and a reload
>>>> sorted
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> B CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>>>>
>>>> B Sent from my iPhone 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B On 27 Oct 2010, at 4:17 PM, "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> B > yes received this debugging messages after putting deb ip icmp or
>>>> deb
>>>> ip
>>>> packets
>>>> B >
>>>> B > CE01#debug ip icmp
>>>> B > CE01#debug ip packet
>>>> B > CE01#ping 192.168.0.2
>>>> B >
>>>> B > Type escape sequence to abort.
>>>> B > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.2, timeout is 2
>>>> seconds:
>>>> B >
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, sending
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>> sendself
>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.699: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, sending
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>> sendself
>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, sending
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>> sendself
>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, sending
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>> sendself
>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local),
>>>> d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, sending
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE,
>>>> sendself
>>>> FALSE, mtu 0
>>>> B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
>>>> (Vlan100),
>>>> len 100, encapsulation failed.
>>>> B > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>>>> B > CE01#
>>>> B >
>>>> B > --------------------------------------------------
>>>> B > From: "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
>>>> B > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:11 PM
>>>> B > To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> B > Cc: "Elias Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study"
>>>> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>> B > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>> B >
>>>> B >> These outputs looks fine.
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >> Did you get 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on both CEs?
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >> This may give some idea.
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >> Thanks,
>>>> B >> Srinivas
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>> <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >>> here you go:
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table
>>>> B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B
>>>> Outgoing B Next
>>>> Hop
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B
>>>> interface
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> 17 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B B
>>>> Gi1/1/1
>>>> B >>> 10.0.0.2
>>>> B >>> 18 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(100) B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>> B
>>>> Vl100 point2point
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table detail
>>>> B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B
>>>> Outgoing B Next
>>>> Hop
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B
>>>> interface
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> 17 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B B
>>>> Gi1/1/1
>>>> B >>> 10.0.0.2
>>>> B >>> B B B B MAC/Encaps=14/14, MRU=1504, Label Stack{}
>>>> B >>> B B B B 002334947D42001DE63D1F428847
>>>> B >>> B B B B No output feature configured
>>>> B >>> 18 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(100) B B B B 0 B B B B B
>>>> B
>>>> Vl100 point2point
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> B B B B MAC/Encaps=0/0, MRU=0, Label Stack{}
>>>> B >>> B B B B No output feature configured
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> *From:* Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>
>>>> B >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:05 PM
>>>> B >>> *To:* srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
>>>> B >>> *Cc:* Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> ; Group
>>>> Study<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>> B >>> *Subject:* Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> you are probably right and it looks right based on the fact that
>>>> PEs
>>>> are
>>>> B >>> connected back to back. But I am curious about the fact that on a
>>>> 7200
>>>> B >>> platform the command also displays the Tunnel label: imp-null,
>>>> see
>>>> output
>>>> B >>> below, whilst on the ME3750 it does not. I wonder, is this
>>>> because
>>>> this
>>>> is
>>>> B >>> how the me3750 displays the output of the command or is it
>>>> because
>>>> the
>>>> B >>> implicit-null is not there?
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> Manaf, I would apprecuate it if you send the output of: sh mpls
>>>> B >>> forwarding-table, it will help me understand a bit better the
>>>> me3750.
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> This is what you get on the 7200
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls forwarding-table
>>>> B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B
>>>> Outgoing B Next
>>>> Hop
>>>> B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B
>>>> interface
>>>> B >>> 19 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B B
>>>> Se2/2
>>>> B >>> point2point
>>>> B >>> 23 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(111) B B B B 860 B B B B B
>>>> none point2point
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
>>>> B >>> Local interface: Fa0/0 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up
>>>> B >>> B Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 111, VC status: up
>>>> B >>> B B Output interface: Se2/2, imposed label stack {23}
>>>> B >>> B B Preferred path: not configured
>>>> B >>> B B Default path: active
>>>> B >>> B B Tunnel label: imp-null, next hop point2point
>>>> B >>> B Create time: 00:19:56, last status change time: 00:19:05
>>>> B >>> B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
>>>> B >>> B B MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote 23
>>>> B >>> B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>> B >>> B B MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
>>>> B >>> B B Remote interface description:
>>>> B >>> B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>>> B >>> B VC statistics:
>>>> B >>> B B packet totals: receive 26, send 25
>>>> B >>> B B byte totals: B receive 7206, send 7144
>>>> B >>> B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> On 27 October 2010 14:20, srinivas pv
>>>> <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>>> Since PEs are connected back-to-back, I do not think any issues
>>>> with
>>>> LDP
>>>> B >>>> here.
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> Also VC labels are setup properly.
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> On PE1:
>>>> B >>>> > B B packet totals: receive 0, send 5 B <<<<< receive counters
>>>> not
>>>> B >>>> incrementing
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 0, send 630
>>>> B >>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> On PE2:
>>>> B >>>> > B VC statistics:
>>>> B >>>> > B B packet totals: receive 5, send 0 B <<<<< send counters
>>>> not
>>>> B >>>> incrementing
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 540, send 0
>>>> B >>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> You may need to enable 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on CEs
>>>> and
>>>> may
>>>> get
>>>> B >>>> some ideas.
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> Thanks,
>>>> B >>>> Srinivas
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Elias Chari
>>>> <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>>> check to make sure LDP (not targeted) works ok and that you
>>>> have
>>>> a
>>>> label
>>>> B >>>>> to
>>>> B >>>>> reach the remote PE loopback address.
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>> On 27 October 2010 13:24, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>> > ########### PE01 ###########
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > PE01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
>>>> B >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
>>>> B >>>>> > B Interworking type is Ethernet
>>>> B >>>>> > B Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {18}
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Preferred path: not configured
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Default path: active
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Next hop: 10.0.0.2
>>>> B >>>>> > B Create time: 00:22:03, last status change time: 00:07:53
>>>> B >>>>> > B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Targeted Hello: 1.1.1.1(LDP Id) -> 2.2.2.2
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Status TLV support (local/remote) B : enabled/not
>>>> supported
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Label/status state machine B B B B : established,
>>>> LruRru
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local dataplane B status rcvd: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local B LDP TLV B B status sent: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last remote LDP TLV B B status rcvd: not sent
>>>> B >>>>> > B B MPLS VC labels: local 20, remote 18
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>> B >>>>> > B B MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Remote interface description:
>>>> B >>>>> > B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>>> B >>>>> > B VC statistics:
>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet totals: receive 0, send 5
>>>> B >>>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 0, send 630
>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > PE01#sh run int g1/1/2
>>>> B >>>>> > Building configuration...
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes
>>>> B >>>>> > !
>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
>>>> B >>>>> > B description To CE01
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>> B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000
>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > ###### PE02 ############
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > PE02#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
>>>> B >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
>>>> B >>>>> > B Interworking type is Ethernet
>>>> B >>>>> > B Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {20}
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Preferred path: not configured
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Default path: active
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Next hop: 10.0.0.1
>>>> B >>>>> > B Create time: 00:21:35, last status change time: 00:09:38
>>>> B >>>>> > B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Status TLV support (local/remote) B : enabled/not
>>>> supported
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Label/status state machine B B B B : established,
>>>> LruRru
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local dataplane B status rcvd: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last local B LDP TLV B B status sent: no fault
>>>> B >>>>> > B B B Last remote LDP TLV B B status rcvd: not sent
>>>> B >>>>> > B B MPLS VC labels: local 18, remote 20
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>> B >>>>> > B B MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
>>>> B >>>>> > B B Remote interface description:
>>>> B >>>>> > B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>>> B >>>>> > B VC statistics:
>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet totals: receive 5, send 0
>>>> B >>>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 540, send 0
>>>> B >>>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > PE02#sh run int g1/1/2
>>>> B >>>>> > Building configuration...
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes
>>>> B >>>>> > !
>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
>>>> B >>>>> > B description to CE01
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>> B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000
>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > ########### CE01 ############
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > CE01#sh run int g1/0/25
>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
>>>> B >>>>> > B description to PE01
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>> B >>>>> > !
>>>> B >>>>> > CE01#sh run int vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > interface Vlan100
>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > ######### CE02 ###########
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > CE02#sh run int g1/1/1
>>>> B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
>>>> B >>>>> > B description to PE02
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>> B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000
>>>> B >>>>> > end
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > CE02#sh run int vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > interface Vlan100
>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > From: srinivas pv
>>>> B >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:42 PM
>>>> B >>>>> > To: Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>> B >>>>> > Cc: Group Study
>>>> B >>>>> > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > Hi,
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > Could you give following details
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > On both PEs:
>>>> B >>>>> > show mpls l2 vc detail
>>>> B >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to CE>
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > On both CEs:
>>>> B >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to PE>
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> B >>>>> > Srinivas
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>> <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> B >>>>> > wrote:
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B Hi,
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as
>>>> below.
>>>> B >>>>> > everything
>>>> B >>>>> > B seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP
>>>> B >>>>> > B but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from
>>>> CE01
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B PC01---CE01---PE01---PE02---CE02---PC02
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B I have applied the following configuration on PE01 & PE02
>>>> ES
>>>> ports
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B interface loopback 0
>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>> B >>>>> > B interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
>>>> B >>>>> > B description to PE02
>>>> B >>>>> > B ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
>>>> B >>>>> > B mpls ip
>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>> B >>>>> > B interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
>>>> B >>>>> > B description to CE01
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport mode access
>>>> B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>> B >>>>> > B vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B !
>>>> B >>>>> > B interface vlan 100
>>>> B >>>>> > B xconnect 2.2.2.2 100 encapsulation mpls
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B where could me my problem!
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B Regards,
>>>> B >>>>> > B Manaf Al Oqlah
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > B Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> B >>>>> > B Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> B >>>>> > B http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> B >>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> B >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> B >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> B >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> B >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>>
>>>> B >>>>
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>>
>>>> B >>> --
>>>> B >>> Regards,
>>>> B >>> Elias
>>>> B >>> CCIE#17354
>>>> B >>> Tel: +44 794 386 6320
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> B >>
>>>> B >>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> B >> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> B >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> B >
>>>> B >
>>>> B > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> B >
>>>> B >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> B > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> B
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> B Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> B http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 15:17:04 ART