Manaf - how are your ARP entries? Are MAC addresses being learned?
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:25, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote: > B 1 B * B * B * > > > From: karthik thatikonda > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 6:28 PM > To: Shaughn Smith > Cc: Manaf Al Oqlah ; srinivas pv ; Elias Chari ; Group Study > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS > > > Can you do a traceroute on CE01 and see where it is stopping?. > > > Regards, > > > Karthik. > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > B Did you reload the devices. Had the same issue once and a reload sorted it. > > B CCIE # 23962 (SP) > > B Sent from my iPhone 4 > > > B On 27 Oct 2010, at 4:17 PM, "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote: > > B > yes received this debugging messages after putting deb ip icmp or deb ip > packets > B > > B > CE01#debug ip icmp > B > CE01#debug ip packet > B > CE01#ping 192.168.0.2 > B > > B > Type escape sequence to abort. > B > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds: > B > > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 > (Vlan100), routed via RIB > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, sending > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself > FALSE, mtu 0 > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:02.699: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, encapsulation failed. > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 > (Vlan100), routed via RIB > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, sending > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself > FALSE, mtu 0 > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, encapsulation failed. > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 > (Vlan100), routed via RIB > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, sending > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself > FALSE, mtu 0 > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, encapsulation failed. > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 > (Vlan100), routed via RIB > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, sending > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself > FALSE, mtu 0 > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, encapsulation failed. > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 > (Vlan100), routed via RIB > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, sending > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself > FALSE, mtu 0 > B > *Mar B 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100), > len 100, encapsulation failed. > B > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > B > CE01# > B > > B > -------------------------------------------------- > B > From: "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com> > B > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:11 PM > B > To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com> > B > Cc: "Elias Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" > <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > B > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS > B > > B >> These outputs looks fine. > B >> > B >> Did you get 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on both CEs? > B >> > B >> This may give some idea. > B >> > B >> Thanks, > B >> Srinivas > B >> > B >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> > wrote: > B >> > B >>> here you go: > B >>> > B >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table > B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B Outgoing B Next > Hop > B >>> > B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B interface > B >>> > B >>> 17 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B B Gi1/1/1 > B >>> 10.0.0.2 > B >>> 18 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(100) B B B B 0 B B B B B B Vl100 point2point > B >>> > B >>> > B >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table detail > B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B Outgoing B Next > Hop > B >>> > B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B interface > B >>> > B >>> 17 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B B Gi1/1/1 > B >>> 10.0.0.2 > B >>> B B B B MAC/Encaps=14/14, MRU=1504, Label Stack{} > B >>> B B B B 002334947D42001DE63D1F428847 > B >>> B B B B No output feature configured > B >>> 18 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(100) B B B B 0 B B B B B B Vl100 point2point > B >>> > B >>> B B B B MAC/Encaps=0/0, MRU=0, Label Stack{} > B >>> B B B B No output feature configured > B >>> > B >>> *From:* Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com> > B >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:05 PM > B >>> *To:* srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com> > B >>> *Cc:* Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> ; Group > Study<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > B >>> *Subject:* Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS > B >>> > B >>> you are probably right and it looks right based on the fact that PEs > are > B >>> connected back to back. But I am curious about the fact that on a 7200 > B >>> platform the command also displays the Tunnel label: imp-null, see > output > B >>> below, whilst on the ME3750 it does not. I wonder, is this because this > is > B >>> how the me3750 displays the output of the command or is it because the > B >>> implicit-null is not there? > B >>> > B >>> Manaf, I would apprecuate it if you send the output of: sh mpls > B >>> forwarding-table, it will help me understand a bit better the me3750. > B >>> > B >>> This is what you get on the 7200 > B >>> > B >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls forwarding-table > B >>> Local B Outgoing B B B Prefix B B B B B B Bytes Label B Outgoing B Next > Hop > B >>> Label B Label or VC B or Tunnel Id B B B Switched B B B interface > B >>> 19 B B Pop Label B B 2.2.2.2/32 B B B B 0 B B B B B B Se2/2 > B >>> point2point > B >>> 23 B B No Label B B B l2ckt(111) B B B B 860 B B B B B none point2point > B >>> > B >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls l2transport vc detail > B >>> Local interface: Fa0/0 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up > B >>> B Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 111, VC status: up > B >>> B B Output interface: Se2/2, imposed label stack {23} > B >>> B B Preferred path: not configured > B >>> B B Default path: active > B >>> B B Tunnel label: imp-null, next hop point2point > B >>> B Create time: 00:19:56, last status change time: 00:19:05 > B >>> B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up > B >>> B B MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote 23 > B >>> B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0 > B >>> B B MTU: local 1500, remote 1500 > B >>> B B Remote interface description: > B >>> B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled > B >>> B VC statistics: > B >>> B B packet totals: receive 26, send 25 > B >>> B B byte totals: B receive 7206, send 7144 > B >>> B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0 > B >>> > B >>> > B >>> On 27 October 2010 14:20, srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com> > wrote: > B >>> > B >>>> Since PEs are connected back-to-back, I do not think any issues with > LDP > B >>>> here. > B >>>> > B >>>> Also VC labels are setup properly. > B >>>> > B >>>> On PE1: > B >>>> > B B packet totals: receive 0, send 5 B <<<<< receive counters not > B >>>> incrementing > B >>>> > B >>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 0, send 630 > B >>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0 > B >>>> > B >>>> On PE2: > B >>>> > B VC statistics: > B >>>> > B B packet totals: receive 5, send 0 B <<<<< send counters not > B >>>> incrementing > B >>>> > B >>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 540, send 0 > B >>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0 > B >>>> > B >>>> You may need to enable 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on CEs and may > get > B >>>> some ideas. > B >>>> > B >>>> Thanks, > B >>>> Srinivas > B >>>> > B >>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Elias Chari > <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>wrote: > B >>>> > B >>>>> check to make sure LDP (not targeted) works ok and that you have a > label > B >>>>> to > B >>>>> reach the remote PE loopback address. > B >>>>> > B >>>>> On 27 October 2010 13:24, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote: > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > ########### PE01 ########### > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > PE01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail > B >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up > B >>>>> > B Interworking type is Ethernet > B >>>>> > B Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: up > B >>>>> > B B Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {18} > B >>>>> > B B Preferred path: not configured > B >>>>> > B B Default path: active > B >>>>> > B B Next hop: 10.0.0.2 > B >>>>> > B Create time: 00:22:03, last status change time: 00:07:53 > B >>>>> > B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up > B >>>>> > B B Targeted Hello: 1.1.1.1(LDP Id) -> 2.2.2.2 > B >>>>> > B B Status TLV support (local/remote) B : enabled/not supported > B >>>>> > B B B Label/status state machine B B B B : established, LruRru > B >>>>> > B B B Last local dataplane B status rcvd: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last local B LDP TLV B B status sent: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last remote LDP TLV B B status rcvd: not sent > B >>>>> > B B MPLS VC labels: local 20, remote 18 > B >>>>> > B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0 > B >>>>> > B B MTU: local 1900, remote 1900 > B >>>>> > B B Remote interface description: > B >>>>> > B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled > B >>>>> > B VC statistics: > B >>>>> > B B packet totals: receive 0, send 5 > B >>>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 0, send 630 > B >>>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0 > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > PE01#sh run int g1/1/2 > B >>>>> > Building configuration... > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes > B >>>>> > ! > B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2 > B >>>>> > B description To CE01 > B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B switchport mode access > B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000 > B >>>>> > end > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > ###### PE02 ############ > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > PE02#sh mpls l2transport vc detail > B >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up > B >>>>> > B Interworking type is Ethernet > B >>>>> > B Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 100, VC status: up > B >>>>> > B B Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {20} > B >>>>> > B B Preferred path: not configured > B >>>>> > B B Default path: active > B >>>>> > B B Next hop: 10.0.0.1 > B >>>>> > B Create time: 00:21:35, last status change time: 00:09:38 > B >>>>> > B Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up > B >>>>> > B B Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1 > B >>>>> > B B Status TLV support (local/remote) B : enabled/not supported > B >>>>> > B B B Label/status state machine B B B B : established, LruRru > B >>>>> > B B B Last local dataplane B status rcvd: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last local B LDP TLV B B status sent: no fault > B >>>>> > B B B Last remote LDP TLV B B status rcvd: not sent > B >>>>> > B B MPLS VC labels: local 18, remote 20 > B >>>>> > B B Group ID: local 0, remote 0 > B >>>>> > B B MTU: local 1900, remote 1900 > B >>>>> > B B Remote interface description: > B >>>>> > B Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled > B >>>>> > B VC statistics: > B >>>>> > B B packet totals: receive 5, send 0 > B >>>>> > B B byte totals: B receive 540, send 0 > B >>>>> > B B packet drops: B receive 0, send 0 > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > PE02#sh run int g1/1/2 > B >>>>> > Building configuration... > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes > B >>>>> > ! > B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2 > B >>>>> > B description to CE01 > B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B switchport mode access > B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000 > B >>>>> > end > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > ########### CE01 ############ > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > CE01#sh run int g1/0/25 > B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25 > B >>>>> > B description to PE01 > B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B switchport mode access > B >>>>> > end > B >>>>> > ! > B >>>>> > CE01#sh run int vlan 100 > B >>>>> > interface Vlan100 > B >>>>> > B ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > ######### CE02 ########### > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > CE02#sh run int g1/1/1 > B >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1 > B >>>>> > B description to PE02 > B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B switchport mode access > B >>>>> > B speed auto 1000 > B >>>>> > end > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > CE02#sh run int vlan 100 > B >>>>> > interface Vlan100 > B >>>>> > B ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > From: srinivas pv > B >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:42 PM > B >>>>> > To: Manaf Al Oqlah > B >>>>> > Cc: Group Study > B >>>>> > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > Hi, > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > Could you give following details > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > On both PEs: > B >>>>> > show mpls l2 vc detail > B >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to CE> > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > On both CEs: > B >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to PE> > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > Thanks, > B >>>>> > Srinivas > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah > <manafo_at_hotmail.com> > B >>>>> > wrote: > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B Hi, > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as below. > B >>>>> > everything > B >>>>> > B seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP > B >>>>> > B but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from CE01 > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B PC01---CE01---PE01---PE02---CE02---PC02 > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B I have applied the following configuration on PE01 & PE02 ES ports > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B interface loopback 0 > B >>>>> > B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 > B >>>>> > B ! > B >>>>> > B interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1 > B >>>>> > B description to PE02 > B >>>>> > B ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252 > B >>>>> > B mpls ip > B >>>>> > B ! > B >>>>> > B interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2 > B >>>>> > B description to CE01 > B >>>>> > B switchport mode access > B >>>>> > B switchport access vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B ! > B >>>>> > B vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B ! > B >>>>> > B interface vlan 100 > B >>>>> > B xconnect 2.2.2.2 100 encapsulation mpls > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B where could me my problem! > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B Regards, > B >>>>> > B Manaf Al Oqlah > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > B Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > _______________________________________________________________________ > B >>>>> > B Subscription information may be found at: > B >>>>> > B http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > B >>>>> > > B >>>>> > > _______________________________________________________________________ > B >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at: > B >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > _______________________________________________________________________ > B >>>>> Subscription information may be found at: > B >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>>> > B >>>> > B >>> > B >>> > B >>> -- > B >>> Regards, > B >>> Elias > B >>> CCIE#17354 > B >>> Tel: +44 794 386 6320 > B >> > B >> > B >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > B >> > B >> _______________________________________________________________________ > B >> Subscription information may be found at: > B >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > B > > B > > B > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > B > > B > _______________________________________________________________________ > B > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > B Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > B _______________________________________________________________________ > B Subscription information may be found at: > B http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 11:01:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART