Re: Redistribution & Sham-link ISSUE

If you have routing information for those subnets but no reachability then check that your Mpls is working 100%

Check your MPLS forwarding tables and make sure all labels are correct.

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

Sent from my iPhone 4

On 28 Oct 2010, at 4:31 AM, Anbu <ksanpu_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All
> I am facing an issue in the OSPF sham-link configuration , my setup is two
> customer sites connecting to MPLS back bone at the same time have a
> connection in between the sites.
>
> Say I have two sites Site A and Site B.both sites have O , O IA , O E2
> routes. when i am redistributing from the OSPF to Address family of
> perticular VRF* ( redistribute ospf 1 vrf VPNX match internal external 1
> external 2)* , it is working perfect.
>
> But if i didnot include the *match internal external 1 external 2 *in the
> PE(connecting to Site B) when redistributing , I cannot reach those
> External routes from Site A,
> but the Site A routers donot remove those Routes from the routing table.
>
> Can anyone help to overcome this issue.
>
> When i was troubleshooting this ,
> Even i remove all the redistribution in the PE routers , all the routes are
> learning through the sham-link , but readability is not there.
>
> Regards,
> Anbu.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 07:04:53 ART