Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS

Can you do a traceroute on CE01 and see where it is stopping?.

Regards,

Karthik.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Did you reload the devices. Had the same issue once and a reload sorted it.
>
> CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4
>
> On 27 Oct 2010, at 4:17 PM, "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > yes received this debugging messages after putting deb ip icmp or deb ip
> packets
> >
> > CE01#debug ip icmp
> > CE01#debug ip packet
> > CE01#ping 192.168.0.2
> >
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> >
> > *Mar 2 01:50:02.690: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
> > *Mar 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, sending
> > *Mar 2 01:50:02.690: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself
> FALSE, mtu 0
> > *Mar 2 01:50:02.699: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, encapsulation failed.
> > *Mar 2 01:50:04.695: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
> > *Mar 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, sending
> > *Mar 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself
> FALSE, mtu 0
> > *Mar 2 01:50:04.695: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, encapsulation failed.
> > *Mar 2 01:50:06.700: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
> > *Mar 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, sending
> > *Mar 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself
> FALSE, mtu 0
> > *Mar 2 01:50:06.700: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, encapsulation failed.
> > *Mar 2 01:50:08.705: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
> > *Mar 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, sending
> > *Mar 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself
> FALSE, mtu 0
> > *Mar 2 01:50:08.705: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, encapsulation failed.
> > *Mar 2 01:50:10.710: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2
> (Vlan100), routed via RIB
> > *Mar 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, sending
> > *Mar 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, output feature, Check hwidb(63), rtype 1, forus FALSE, sendself
> FALSE, mtu 0
> > *Mar 2 01:50:10.710: IP: s=192.168.0.1 (local), d=192.168.0.2 (Vlan100),
> len 100, encapsulation failed.
> > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
> > CE01#
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "srinivas pv" <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:11 PM
> > To: "Manaf Al Oqlah" <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
> > Cc: "Elias Chari" <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>; "Group Study" <
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
> >
> >> These outputs looks fine.
> >>
> >> Did you get 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on both CEs?
> >>
> >> This may give some idea.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Srinivas
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> here you go:
> >>>
> >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table
> >>> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next
> Hop
> >>>
> >>> Label Label or VC or Tunnel Id Switched interface
> >>>
> >>> 17 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Gi1/1/1
> >>> 10.0.0.2
> >>> 18 No Label l2ckt(100) 0 Vl100 point2point
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table detail
> >>> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next
> Hop
> >>>
> >>> Label Label or VC or Tunnel Id Switched interface
> >>>
> >>> 17 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Gi1/1/1
> >>> 10.0.0.2
> >>> MAC/Encaps=14/14, MRU=1504, Label Stack{}
> >>> 002334947D42001DE63D1F428847
> >>> No output feature configured
> >>> 18 No Label l2ckt(100) 0 Vl100 point2point
> >>>
> >>> MAC/Encaps=0/0, MRU=0, Label Stack{}
> >>> No output feature configured
> >>>
> >>> *From:* Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com>
> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:05 PM
> >>> *To:* srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
> >>> *Cc:* Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> ; Group Study<
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> >>> *Subject:* Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
> >>>
> >>> you are probably right and it looks right based on the fact that PEs
> are
> >>> connected back to back. But I am curious about the fact that on a 7200
> >>> platform the command also displays the Tunnel label: imp-null, see
> output
> >>> below, whilst on the ME3750 it does not. I wonder, is this because this
> is
> >>> how the me3750 displays the output of the command or is it because the
> >>> implicit-null is not there?
> >>>
> >>> Manaf, I would apprecuate it if you send the output of: sh mpls
> >>> forwarding-table, it will help me understand a bit better the me3750.
> >>>
> >>> This is what you get on the 7200
> >>>
> >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls forwarding-table
> >>> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next
> Hop
> >>> Label Label or VC or Tunnel Id Switched interface
> >>> 19 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Se2/2
> >>> point2point
> >>> 23 No Label l2ckt(111) 860 none point2point
> >>>
> >>> Rack1R1#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
> >>> Local interface: Fa0/0 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up
> >>> Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 111, VC status: up
> >>> Output interface: Se2/2, imposed label stack {23}
> >>> Preferred path: not configured
> >>> Default path: active
> >>> Tunnel label: imp-null, next hop point2point
> >>> Create time: 00:19:56, last status change time: 00:19:05
> >>> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
> >>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote 23
> >>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> >>> MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
> >>> Remote interface description:
> >>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> >>> VC statistics:
> >>> packet totals: receive 26, send 25
> >>> byte totals: receive 7206, send 7144
> >>> packet drops: receive 0, send 0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 27 October 2010 14:20, srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Since PEs are connected back-to-back, I do not think any issues with
> LDP
> >>>> here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also VC labels are setup properly.
> >>>>
> >>>> On PE1:
> >>>> > packet totals: receive 0, send 5 <<<<< receive counters not
> >>>> incrementing
> >>>>
> >>>> > byte totals: receive 0, send 630
> >>>> > packet drops: receive 0, send 0
> >>>>
> >>>> On PE2:
> >>>> > VC statistics:
> >>>> > packet totals: receive 5, send 0 <<<<< send counters not
> >>>> incrementing
> >>>>
> >>>> > byte totals: receive 540, send 0
> >>>> > packet drops: receive 0, send 0
> >>>>
> >>>> You may need to enable 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on CEs and may
> get
> >>>> some ideas.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Srinivas
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> check to make sure LDP (not targeted) works ok and that you have a
> label
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> reach the remote PE loopback address.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 27 October 2010 13:24, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > ########### PE01 ###########
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > PE01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
> >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
> >>>>> > Interworking type is Ethernet
> >>>>> > Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
> >>>>> > Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {18}
> >>>>> > Preferred path: not configured
> >>>>> > Default path: active
> >>>>> > Next hop: 10.0.0.2
> >>>>> > Create time: 00:22:03, last status change time: 00:07:53
> >>>>> > Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
> >>>>> > Targeted Hello: 1.1.1.1(LDP Id) -> 2.2.2.2
> >>>>> > Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/not supported
> >>>>> > Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> >>>>> > Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault
> >>>>> > Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
> >>>>> > Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
> >>>>> > Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault
> >>>>> > Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: not sent
> >>>>> > MPLS VC labels: local 20, remote 18
> >>>>> > Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> >>>>> > MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
> >>>>> > Remote interface description:
> >>>>> > Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> >>>>> > VC statistics:
> >>>>> > packet totals: receive 0, send 5
> >>>>> > byte totals: receive 0, send 630
> >>>>> > packet drops: receive 0, send 0
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > PE01#sh run int g1/1/2
> >>>>> > Building configuration...
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
> >>>>> > description To CE01
> >>>>> > switchport access vlan 100
> >>>>> > switchport mode access
> >>>>> > speed auto 1000
> >>>>> > end
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > ###### PE02 ############
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > PE02#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
> >>>>> > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
> >>>>> > Interworking type is Ethernet
> >>>>> > Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
> >>>>> > Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {20}
> >>>>> > Preferred path: not configured
> >>>>> > Default path: active
> >>>>> > Next hop: 10.0.0.1
> >>>>> > Create time: 00:21:35, last status change time: 00:09:38
> >>>>> > Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up
> >>>>> > Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1
> >>>>> > Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/not supported
> >>>>> > Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> >>>>> > Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault
> >>>>> > Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
> >>>>> > Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
> >>>>> > Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault
> >>>>> > Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: not sent
> >>>>> > MPLS VC labels: local 18, remote 20
> >>>>> > Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> >>>>> > MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
> >>>>> > Remote interface description:
> >>>>> > Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> >>>>> > VC statistics:
> >>>>> > packet totals: receive 5, send 0
> >>>>> > byte totals: receive 540, send 0
> >>>>> > packet drops: receive 0, send 0
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > PE02#sh run int g1/1/2
> >>>>> > Building configuration...
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Current configuration : 128 bytes
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
> >>>>> > description to CE01
> >>>>> > switchport access vlan 100
> >>>>> > switchport mode access
> >>>>> > speed auto 1000
> >>>>> > end
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > ########### CE01 ############
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > CE01#sh run int g1/0/25
> >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
> >>>>> > description to PE01
> >>>>> > switchport access vlan 100
> >>>>> > switchport mode access
> >>>>> > end
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > CE01#sh run int vlan 100
> >>>>> > interface Vlan100
> >>>>> > ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > ######### CE02 ###########
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > CE02#sh run int g1/1/1
> >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> >>>>> > description to PE02
> >>>>> > switchport access vlan 100
> >>>>> > switchport mode access
> >>>>> > speed auto 1000
> >>>>> > end
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > CE02#sh run int vlan 100
> >>>>> > interface Vlan100
> >>>>> > ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > From: srinivas pv
> >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:42 PM
> >>>>> > To: Manaf Al Oqlah
> >>>>> > Cc: Group Study
> >>>>> > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Hi,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Could you give following details
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On both PEs:
> >>>>> > show mpls l2 vc detail
> >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to CE>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On both CEs:
> >>>>> > sh run int <int connected to PE>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Thanks,
> >>>>> > Srinivas
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah <
> manafo_at_hotmail.com>
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Hi,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as below.
> >>>>> > everything
> >>>>> > seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP
> >>>>> > but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from CE01
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > PC01---CE01---PE01---PE02---CE02---PC02
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > I have applied the following configuration on PE01 & PE02 ES ports
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > interface loopback 0
> >>>>> > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> >>>>> > description to PE02
> >>>>> > ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
> >>>>> > mpls ip
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
> >>>>> > description to CE01
> >>>>> > switchport mode access
> >>>>> > switchport access vlan 100
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > vlan 100
> >>>>> > !
> >>>>> > interface vlan 100
> >>>>> > xconnect 2.2.2.2 100 encapsulation mpls
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > where could me my problem!
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Regards,
> >>>>> > Manaf Al Oqlah
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Elias
> >>> CCIE#17354
> >>> Tel: +44 794 386 6320
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Oct 27 2010 - 08:28:35 ART