here you go:
PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
17     Pop Label     2.2.2.2/32        0             Gi1/1/1    10.0.0.2
18     No Label      l2ckt(100)        0             Vl100      point2point
PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table detail
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
17     Pop Label     2.2.2.2/32        0             Gi1/1/1    10.0.0.2
        MAC/Encaps=14/14, MRU=1504, Label Stack{}
        002334947D42001DE63D1F428847
        No output feature configured
18     No Label      l2ckt(100)        0             Vl100      point2point
        MAC/Encaps=0/0, MRU=0, Label Stack{}
        No output feature configured
From: Elias Chari
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:05 PM
To: srinivas pv
Cc: Manaf Al Oqlah ; Group Study
Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
you are probably right and it looks right based on the fact that PEs are
connected back to back. But I am curious about the fact that on a 7200
platform the command also displays the Tunnel label: imp-null, see output
below, whilst on the ME3750 it does not. I wonder, is this because this is how
the me3750 displays the output of the command or is it because the
implicit-null is not there?
Manaf, I would apprecuate it if you send the output of: sh mpls
forwarding-table, it will help me understand a bit better the me3750.
This is what you get on the 7200
Rack1R1#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
19     Pop Label     2.2.2.2/32        0             Se2/2      point2point
23     No Label      l2ckt(111)        860           none       point2point
Rack1R1#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
Local interface: Fa0/0 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up
  Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 111, VC status: up
    Output interface: Se2/2, imposed label stack {23}
    Preferred path: not configured
    Default path: active
    Tunnel label: imp-null, next hop point2point
  Create time: 00:19:56, last status change time: 00:19:05
  Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
    MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote 23
    Group ID: local 0, remote 0
    MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
    Remote interface description:
  Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
  VC statistics:
    packet totals: receive 26, send 25
    byte totals:   receive 7206, send 7144
    packet drops:  receive 0, send 0
On 27 October 2010 14:20, srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com> wrote:
  Since PEs are connected back-to-back, I do not think any issues with LDP
here.
  Also VC labels are setup properly.
  On PE1:
  >    packet totals: receive 0, send 5  <<<<< receive counters not
incrementing
  >    byte totals:   receive 0, send 630
  >    packet drops:  receive 0, send 0
  On PE2:
  >  VC statistics:
  >    packet totals: receive 5, send 0  <<<<< send counters not incrementing
  >    byte totals:   receive 540, send 0
  >    packet drops:  receive 0, send 0
  You may need to enable 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on CEs and may get
some ideas.
  Thanks,
  Srinivas
  On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com> wrote:
    check to make sure LDP (not targeted) works ok and that you have a label
to
    reach the remote PE loopback address.
    On 27 October 2010 13:24, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
    > ########### PE01 ###########
    >
    > PE01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
    > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
    >  Interworking type is Ethernet
    >  Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
    >    Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {18}
    >    Preferred path: not configured
    >    Default path: active
    >    Next hop: 10.0.0.2
    >  Create time: 00:22:03, last status change time: 00:07:53
    >  Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
    >    Targeted Hello: 1.1.1.1(LDP Id) -> 2.2.2.2
    >    Status TLV support (local/remote)   : enabled/not supported
    >      Label/status state machine        : established, LruRru
    >      Last local dataplane   status rcvd: no fault
    >      Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
    >      Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
    >      Last local  LDP TLV    status sent: no fault
    >      Last remote LDP TLV    status rcvd: not sent
    >    MPLS VC labels: local 20, remote 18
    >    Group ID: local 0, remote 0
    >    MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
    >    Remote interface description:
    >  Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
    >  VC statistics:
    >    packet totals: receive 0, send 5
    >    byte totals:   receive 0, send 630
    >    packet drops:  receive 0, send 0
    >
    > PE01#sh run int g1/1/2
    > Building configuration...
    >
    > Current configuration : 128 bytes
    > !
    > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
    >  description To CE01
    >  switchport access vlan 100
    >  switchport mode access
    >  speed auto 1000
    > end
    >
    > ###### PE02 ############
    >
    > PE02#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
    > Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
    >  Interworking type is Ethernet
    >  Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
    >    Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {20}
    >    Preferred path: not configured
    >    Default path: active
    >    Next hop: 10.0.0.1
    >  Create time: 00:21:35, last status change time: 00:09:38
    >  Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up
    >    Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1
    >    Status TLV support (local/remote)   : enabled/not supported
    >      Label/status state machine        : established, LruRru
    >      Last local dataplane   status rcvd: no fault
    >      Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
    >      Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
    >      Last local  LDP TLV    status sent: no fault
    >      Last remote LDP TLV    status rcvd: not sent
    >    MPLS VC labels: local 18, remote 20
    >    Group ID: local 0, remote 0
    >    MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
    >    Remote interface description:
    >  Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
    >  VC statistics:
    >    packet totals: receive 5, send 0
    >    byte totals:   receive 540, send 0
    >    packet drops:  receive 0, send 0
    >
    > PE02#sh run int g1/1/2
    > Building configuration...
    >
    > Current configuration : 128 bytes
    > !
    > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
    >  description to CE01
    >  switchport access vlan 100
    >  switchport mode access
    >  speed auto 1000
    > end
    >
    > ########### CE01 ############
    >
    > CE01#sh run int g1/0/25
    > interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
    >  description to PE01
    >  switchport access vlan 100
    >  switchport mode access
    > end
    > !
    > CE01#sh run int vlan 100
    > interface Vlan100
    >  ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
    >
    > ######### CE02 ###########
    >
    > CE02#sh run int g1/1/1
    > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
    >  description to PE02
    >  switchport access vlan 100
    >  switchport mode access
    >  speed auto 1000
    > end
    >
    > CE02#sh run int vlan 100
    > interface Vlan100
    >  ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > From: srinivas pv
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:42 PM
    > To: Manaf Al Oqlah
    > Cc: Group Study
    > Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
    >
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    >
    > Could you give following details
    >
    >
    > On both PEs:
    > show mpls l2 vc detail
    > sh run int <int connected to CE>
    >
    >
    > On both CEs:
    > sh run int <int connected to PE>
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Srinivas
    >
    >
    >
    > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >  Hi,
    >
    >  I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as below.
    > everything
    >  seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP
    >  but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from CE01
    >
    >  PC01---CE01---PE01---PE02---CE02---PC02
    >
    >  I have applied the following configuration on PE01 & PE02 ES ports
    >
    >  interface loopback 0
    >  ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
    >  !
    >  interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
    >  description to PE02
    >   ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
    >   mpls ip
    >  !
    >  interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
    >  description to CE01
    >  switchport mode access
    >  switchport access vlan 100
    >  !
    >  vlan 100
    >  !
    >  interface vlan 100
    >  xconnect 2.2.2.2 100 encapsulation mpls
    >
    >  where could me my problem!
    >
    >  Regards,
    >  Manaf Al Oqlah
    >
    >
    >  Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
    >
    >
Received on Wed Oct 27 2010 - 17:06:10 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART