Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS

From: Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:06:10 +0300

here you go:

PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop
Label Label or VC or Tunnel Id Switched interface
17 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Gi1/1/1 10.0.0.2
18 No Label l2ckt(100) 0 Vl100 point2point

PE01#sh mpls forwarding-table detail
Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop
Label Label or VC or Tunnel Id Switched interface
17 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Gi1/1/1 10.0.0.2
        MAC/Encaps=14/14, MRU=1504, Label Stack{}
        002334947D42001DE63D1F428847
        No output feature configured
18 No Label l2ckt(100) 0 Vl100 point2point
        MAC/Encaps=0/0, MRU=0, Label Stack{}
        No output feature configured

From: Elias Chari
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:05 PM
To: srinivas pv
Cc: Manaf Al Oqlah ; Group Study
Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS

you are probably right and it looks right based on the fact that PEs are
connected back to back. But I am curious about the fact that on a 7200
platform the command also displays the Tunnel label: imp-null, see output
below, whilst on the ME3750 it does not. I wonder, is this because this is how
the me3750 displays the output of the command or is it because the
implicit-null is not there?

Manaf, I would apprecuate it if you send the output of: sh mpls
forwarding-table, it will help me understand a bit better the me3750.

This is what you get on the 7200

Rack1R1#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop
Label Label or VC or Tunnel Id Switched interface
19 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Se2/2 point2point
23 No Label l2ckt(111) 860 none point2point

Rack1R1#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
Local interface: Fa0/0 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up
  Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 111, VC status: up
    Output interface: Se2/2, imposed label stack {23}
    Preferred path: not configured
    Default path: active
    Tunnel label: imp-null, next hop point2point
  Create time: 00:19:56, last status change time: 00:19:05
  Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
    MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote 23
    Group ID: local 0, remote 0
    MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
    Remote interface description:
  Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
  VC statistics:
    packet totals: receive 26, send 25
    byte totals: receive 7206, send 7144
    packet drops: receive 0, send 0

On 27 October 2010 14:20, srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com> wrote:

  Since PEs are connected back-to-back, I do not think any issues with LDP
here.

  Also VC labels are setup properly.

  On PE1:
> packet totals: receive 0, send 5 <<<<< receive counters not
incrementing

> byte totals: receive 0, send 630
> packet drops: receive 0, send 0

  On PE2:
> VC statistics:
> packet totals: receive 5, send 0 <<<<< send counters not incrementing

> byte totals: receive 540, send 0
> packet drops: receive 0, send 0

  You may need to enable 'deb ip icmp' and 'deb ip pack' on CEs and may get
some ideas.

  Thanks,
  Srinivas

  On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Elias Chari <elias.chari_at_gmail.com> wrote:

    check to make sure LDP (not targeted) works ok and that you have a label
to
    reach the remote PE loopback address.

    On 27 October 2010 13:24, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> ########### PE01 ###########
>
> PE01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
> Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
> Interworking type is Ethernet
> Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
> Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {18}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: active
> Next hop: 10.0.0.2
> Create time: 00:22:03, last status change time: 00:07:53
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
> Targeted Hello: 1.1.1.1(LDP Id) -> 2.2.2.2
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/not supported
> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault
> Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
> Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: not sent
> MPLS VC labels: local 20, remote 18
> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> VC statistics:
> packet totals: receive 0, send 5
> byte totals: receive 0, send 630
> packet drops: receive 0, send 0
>
> PE01#sh run int g1/1/2
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 128 bytes
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
> description To CE01
> switchport access vlan 100
> switchport mode access
> speed auto 1000
> end
>
> ###### PE02 ############
>
> PE02#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
> Local interface: Vl100 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 100 up
> Interworking type is Ethernet
> Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 100, VC status: up
> Output interface: Gi1/1/1, imposed label stack {20}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: active
> Next hop: 10.0.0.1
> Create time: 00:21:35, last status change time: 00:09:38
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up
> Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/not supported
> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault
> Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault
> Last local SSS circuit status sent: no fault
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: not sent
> MPLS VC labels: local 18, remote 20
> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> MTU: local 1900, remote 1900
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> VC statistics:
> packet totals: receive 5, send 0
> byte totals: receive 540, send 0
> packet drops: receive 0, send 0
>
> PE02#sh run int g1/1/2
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 128 bytes
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
> description to CE01
> switchport access vlan 100
> switchport mode access
> speed auto 1000
> end
>
> ########### CE01 ############
>
> CE01#sh run int g1/0/25
> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
> description to PE01
> switchport access vlan 100
> switchport mode access
> end
> !
> CE01#sh run int vlan 100
> interface Vlan100
> ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
>
> ######### CE02 ###########
>
> CE02#sh run int g1/1/1
> interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> description to PE02
> switchport access vlan 100
> switchport mode access
> speed auto 1000
> end
>
> CE02#sh run int vlan 100
> interface Vlan100
> ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: srinivas pv
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:42 PM
> To: Manaf Al Oqlah
> Cc: Group Study
> Subject: Re: VLAN-based EoMPLS
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Could you give following details
>
>
> On both PEs:
> show mpls l2 vc detail
> sh run int <int connected to CE>
>
>
> On both CEs:
> sh run int <int connected to PE>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Manaf Al Oqlah <manafo_at_hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as below.
> everything
> seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP
> but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from CE01
>
> PC01---CE01---PE01---PE02---CE02---PC02
>
> I have applied the following configuration on PE01 & PE02 ES ports
>
> interface loopback 0
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> description to PE02
> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
> mpls ip
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
> description to CE01
> switchport mode access
> switchport access vlan 100
> !
> vlan 100
> !
> interface vlan 100
> xconnect 2.2.2.2 100 encapsulation mpls
>
> where could me my problem!
>
> Regards,
> Manaf Al Oqlah
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 27 2010 - 17:06:10 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART