Re: Failed - October 8.

The one that has the letter "A" and/or "P" in it.

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Nice,
>
>
>
> Which one is proprietary, LACP or PAGP ?
>
> The one that has more letters b Pb ( P like proprietary) J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Marko
> Milivojevic
> Sent: 20-Oct-10 12:04
> To: Poplawski, James
> Cc: Muzammil Malick; Oskar; --Hammer--; CCIE Group Study
> Subject: Re: Failed - October 8.
>
>
>
> Well... it's actually very easy to remember. MST (802.1s) *requires*
> use of 802.1w. MST has "s" in it, the other one doesn't ;-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 15:50, Poplawski, James
> <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for your advice.
> >
> > The other one is a great way, but when you hit RSTP (802.1w) versus MSTP
> (802.1s), you freak out and double-check.
> >
> > Using the DOCCD and browsing the WAN-Frame Relay section you're able to
> do a
> search (Ctrl+F) and search 1490.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > JB
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Muzammil Malick [mailto:malickmuz_at_gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:43 AM
> > To: Oskar
> > Cc: Marko Milivojevic; Poplawski, James; --Hammer--; CCIE Group Study
> > Subject: Re: Failed - October 8.
> >
> > James
> >
> > Going back to your original email. As someone who has been there and
> > experienced the same issues as you, I would say that regarding small
> > things such as RFC values and 802.xyz issues, its just one of those
> > things that you just have to nail.
> >
> > For me this has always been a non issue because when i took the lab I
> > had to do OEQs so I ended up learning all these things inside out
> > anyways!! B So it doesn't hurt to learn them because
> > in the past people were required to learn them.
> >
> > Also what I would say is that a lot of the stuff that Cisco throws in
> > is along the lines of "Use this type of encapsulation e.g RFC 1490
> > they are really saying, don't use the Cisco method or do use the Cisco
> > method. If you are having problems remembering all the details just
> > remind yourself that you can either use "cisco" or "the other one"
> > Then later on when you have some spare time you can go back and check
> > that you are using the right encapsulation.
> > Im not saying this is a strict rule you should follow, just if you are
> > having problems remembering stuff.
> >
> > Its also great that you passed Troubleshooting because that will give
> > you the confidence to nail TS in the future.
> >
> > Also the great thing is that you know where your problems lie. Some
> > people come out bemused because they thought they had nailed it and
> > dont have a clue where they went wrong. Take heart from your position
> > and move on and nail it
> >
> > Good luck mate.
> >
> > On 20 October 2010 16:06, Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca> wrote:
> >> Marko,
> >>
> >> I am not saying anything about IPE books. I use other vendor materials
> but
> I
> >> prefer not to mention the name. My point is that if I MUST know RFC #s
> to
> >> understand the question than I expect the workbook to work that way too.
> My
> >> workbook will not help me in that regard.
> >>
> >> Now, what are RFCs to know ?
> >> Is there such list so I can type it in mnemosyne
> >> ( http://www.mnemosyne-proj.org/ ) and hammer it every morning ?
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> >> To: Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca>
> >> Cc: "Poplawski, James" <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com>; --Hammer--
> >> <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>; CCIE Group Study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> >> Sent: Wed, October 20, 2010 10:01:00 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Failed - October 8.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 13:40, Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca> wrote:
> >>> On a serious note, vendors who claim to cover 100% of requirements and
> >>>challenge
> >>> students to find a topic not covered in the lab should read your post
> >>>carefully.
> >>> Their silence is at least "interesting".
> >>
> >> Oskar,
> >>
> >> What makes you think that we were silent? James complained that he
> >> didn't pass, it's not our position to publicly "rub it in", but rather
> >> to reach out and assist him in getting ready for his next attempt and
> >> the best way to best use the material available to him. Since he only
> >> mentioned that he had IPexpert material, he can tell you what IPexpert
> >> did as a response to his e-mail. He didn't use our material for his
> >> preparation, but I hope he will for his next go - it will probably
> >> help him a lot.
> >>
> >> Now, I will repeat something often said... Training vendors are not
> >> passing your lab - you are. We provide the material and we cover what
> >> we believe is relevant to make you good engineers and experts, as well
> >> as assist you in passing the lab. You need to use that material, you
> >> need to read books, articles and RFCs referenced from that material if
> >> you want to improve and be well prepared for the lab. There is no
> >> replacement for YOUR work!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>
> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >>
> >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > This transmission contains information for the exclusive use of the
> intended
> recipient and may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected
> from
> disclosure. B Any unauthorized review or distribution is strictly
> prohibited.
> B Our company is required to retain electronic mail messages, which may be
> produced at the request of regulators or in connection with litigation.
> Electronic messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or
> error-free. B
> As such, we recommend that you do not send confidential information to us
> via
> electronic mail. This communication is for informational purposes only and
> is
> not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investment product. B Any
> information regarding specific investment products is subject to change
> without notice. B If you received this transmission in error, please notify
> the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any
> attachments from your system.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1136 / Virus Database: 422/3208 - Release Date: 10/20/10
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net