That's a constant. You just remember 802.1 and then add the letter "s"
as in mSt, or "w" as in "Whatwasitagain"? ;-)
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 16:11, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> wrote: > hahaha > > Don't forget that they both have 802 in them as well. > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> > wrote: >> >> Well... it's actually very easy to remember. MST (802.1s) *requires* >> use of 802.1w. MST has "s" in it, the other one doesn't ;-) >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 15:50, Poplawski, James >> <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com> wrote: >> > Thanks for your advice. >> > >> > The other one is a great way, but when you hit RSTP (802.1w) versus MSTP >> > (802.1s), you freak out and double-check. >> > >> > Using the DOCCD and browsing the WAN-Frame Relay section you're able to >> > do a search (Ctrl+F) and search 1490. >> > >> > Hope this helps, >> > JB >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Muzammil Malick [mailto:malickmuz_at_gmail.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:43 AM >> > To: Oskar >> > Cc: Marko Milivojevic; Poplawski, James; --Hammer--; CCIE Group Study >> > Subject: Re: Failed - October 8. >> > >> > James >> > >> > Going back to your original email. As someone who has been there and >> > experienced the same issues as you, I would say that regarding small >> > things such as RFC values and 802.xyz issues, its just one of those >> > things that you just have to nail. >> > >> > For me this has always been a non issue because when i took the lab I >> > had to do OEQs so I ended up learning all these things inside out >> > anyways!! B So it doesn't hurt to learn them because >> > in the past people were required to learn them. >> > >> > Also what I would say is that a lot of the stuff that Cisco throws in >> > is along the lines of "Use this type of encapsulation e.g RFC 1490 >> > they are really saying, don't use the Cisco method or do use the Cisco >> > method. If you are having problems remembering all the details just >> > remind yourself that you can either use "cisco" or "the other one" >> > Then later on when you have some spare time you can go back and check >> > that you are using the right encapsulation. >> > Im not saying this is a strict rule you should follow, just if you are >> > having problems remembering stuff. >> > >> > Its also great that you passed Troubleshooting because that will give >> > you the confidence to nail TS in the future. >> > >> > Also the great thing is that you know where your problems lie. Some >> > people come out bemused because they thought they had nailed it and >> > dont have a clue where they went wrong. Take heart from your position >> > and move on and nail it >> > >> > Good luck mate. >> > >> > On 20 October 2010 16:06, Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca> wrote: >> >> Marko, >> >> >> >> I am not saying anything about IPE books. I use other vendor materials >> >> but I >> >> prefer not to mention the name. My point is that if I MUST know RFC #s >> >> to >> >> understand the question than I expect the workbook to work that way >> >> too. My >> >> workbook will not help me in that regard. >> >> >> >> Now, what are RFCs to know ? >> >> Is there such list so I can type it in mnemosyne >> >> ( http://www.mnemosyne-proj.org/ ) and hammer it every morning ? >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> >> From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> >> >> To: Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca> >> >> Cc: "Poplawski, James" <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com>; --Hammer-- >> >> <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>; CCIE Group Study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> >> >> Sent: Wed, October 20, 2010 10:01:00 AM >> >> Subject: Re: Failed - October 8. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 13:40, Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca> wrote: >> >>> On a serious note, vendors who claim to cover 100% of requirements and >> >>>challenge >> >>> students to find a topic not covered in the lab should read your post >> >>>carefully. >> >>> Their silence is at least "interesting". >> >> >> >> Oskar, >> >> >> >> What makes you think that we were silent? James complained that he >> >> didn't pass, it's not our position to publicly "rub it in", but rather >> >> to reach out and assist him in getting ready for his next attempt and >> >> the best way to best use the material available to him. Since he only >> >> mentioned that he had IPexpert material, he can tell you what IPexpert >> >> did as a response to his e-mail. He didn't use our material for his >> >> preparation, but I hope he will for his next go - it will probably >> >> help him a lot. >> >> >> >> Now, I will repeat something often said... Training vendors are not >> >> passing your lab - you are. We provide the material and we cover what >> >> we believe is relevant to make you good engineers and experts, as well >> >> as assist you in passing the lab. You need to use that material, you >> >> need to read books, articles and RFCs referenced from that material if >> >> you want to improve and be well prepared for the lab. There is no >> >> replacement for YOUR work! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> >> >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> >> Subscription information may be found at: >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > This transmission contains information for the exclusive use of the >> > intended recipient and may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise >> > protected from disclosure. B Any unauthorized review or distribution is >> > strictly prohibited. B Our company is required to retain electronic mail >> > messages, which may be produced at the request of regulators or in >> > connection with litigation. Electronic messages cannot be guaranteed to be >> > secure, timely or error-free. B As such, we recommend that you do not send >> > confidential information to us via electronic mail. This communication is >> > for informational purposes only and is not an offer or solicitation to buy >> > or sell any investment product. B Any information regarding specific >> > investment products is subject to change without notice. B If you received >> > this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return >> > e-mail and delete this message and any attachments from your system. >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Narbik Kocharians > CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) > www.MicronicsTraining.com > Sr. Technical Instructor > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! > Training And Remote Racks available Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Oct 20 2010 - 16:13:15 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART