Re: Failed - October 8.

I dont think Maurillo is there anymore. I rememeber awhile back someone
saying he left.

Tony

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca> wrote:

> I am not blaming Mairillo but a serious company shoud back what they
> representatives say publicly.
>
> Isn't it ironic that people who do not know how to set a remote lab will
> test my
> ccie knowledge? Remember Vue disaster? He who knows does, he whos doesn't
> writes
> tests.
>
> On a serious note, vendors who claim to cover 100% of requirements and
> challenge
> students to find a topic not covered in the lab should read your post
> carefully.
> Their silence is at least "interesting".
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Poplawski, James" <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com>
> To: Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca>; --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>; CCIE
> Group
> Study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tue, October 19, 2010 4:37:52 PM
> Subject: RE: Failed - October 8.
>
> Not exactly sure where NDA comes into play here, *BUT* I would be mindful
> of
> some of the major RFC/IEEE numbers. Not all of them, but there are a
> couple,
> specifically within Layer2, where if you have familiarity it won't be an
> issue.
>
> On my first attempt, it would probably fall on my own stupidity for not
> remembering for example 802.1w is RAPID STP (802.1Wascally wabbit). I
> learned
> my mistake the first go around, however I got my tail handed to me again
> with
> Frame Relay. Sure I know how to implement the different flavors, but when
> it
> comes to IEEE/RFC I wasn't 100% sure so I had to double-check, which in
> turn
> takes time.
>
> I can't say Frame Relay is on the exam, but I can say it's on the blueprint
> so
> you better know it! :)
> JB
>
> PS - Maurillo can't be blamed for a conference call he did. As an *expert*
> you
> have to roll with the punches and do the best you can. I don't recall
> seeing
> IPv6 Multicast on the blueprint, but it may fall into "3.30 Implement basic
> IPv6
> functionality protocols". Blaming the proctors, Maurilla, Cisco, San
> Jose's
> chipotle burrito, Juniper or Bill Gates isn't going to help you pass the
> exam.
> Being an expert at every topic on the blueprint will certainly help your
> odds.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oskar [mailto:xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:19 PM
> To: --Hammer--; Poplawski, James; CCIE Group Study
> Subject: Re: Failed - October 8.
>
> Ok, perhaps I did not read carefully, but is the knowledge of RFC #s
> required? Maurilio was clear it is not, but this was over year ago. What is
> the sitiution today ?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>
> To: Oskar <xyz7412369_at_yahoo.ca>; "Poplawski, James"
> <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com>; CCIE Group Study <
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tue, October 19, 2010 4:05:28 PM
> Subject: RE: Failed - October 8.
>
> I don't think that is what James is implying.
>
>
>
> --Hammer
>
> "I was a normal American nerd."
> -Jack Herer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Oskar
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:01 PM
> To: Poplawski, James; CCIE Group Study
> Subject: Re: Failed - October 8.
>
> So now we are beeing tested on rfc numbers. Muarilio was clear when he was
> answering questions about new v4 that there will be no this type of
> questions.
> Since he left things have chaged then.
> Do actually proctors have real jobs in networking ? It looks like they run
> an
> internal competition who will come up with most useless question.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Poplawski, James" <jpoplawski_at_starkinvestments.com>
> To: CCIE Group Study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tue, October 19, 2010 10:09:30 AM
> Subject: Failed - October 8.
>
> Good morning,
>
> Just writing in to get some ideas. I had my second attempt at the lab on
> November 8, 2010. I thought I did really well, however I did not pass.
> I've
> worked through INE Vol 1 as well as Narbik's material. Does anyone have
> any
>
> advice?
>
> I seem to get hung up on the wording of Frame Relay questions (LMI
> Autosense,
> RFC1490, etc) as well as Multicast. The problem is, from what I can tell,
> they
> don't ask you specifically to create a P2P sub interface, but in the
> workbooks
> they spell it out. I could definitely use some work on IPv6 multicast and
> general practice on IPv4 Multicast so I have confidence when I get
> anything.
>
> Here's my game plan, unless anyone has suggestions.
> Round out Narbik's Advanced 2.0 Multicast and MPLS sections.
> Go back to INE and do Vol 2-4
> Double-back on any technologies I suck at and do them repetitively
> till
> I can troubleshoot and implement without question or doubt.
> When I start Vol 4, book my lab.
>
> I have IPExpert as well, so not sure how I can pepper that in there.
>
> I was on a kick on the last month of studying 8-9hours a day which once I
> got
> going was awesome. Speed and efficiency were there. I've taken a week or
> so
> off and ready to get back so I don't fall too far off of the wagon. In the
> exam
> I hit some areas I've never seen, some areas I had some doubt on, but I got
> through the entire exam. I did pass Troubleshooting this time, whereas the
> first time I had exam problems, failed both sections and didn't have enough
> time.
>
> Any ideas?
> JB
>
> This transmission contains information for the exclusive use of the
> intended
>
> recipient and may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected
> from
> disclosure. Any unauthorized review or distribution is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> Our company is required to retain electronic mail messages, which may be
> produced at the request of regulators or in connection with litigation.
> Electronic messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or
> error-free.
> As
> such, we recommend that you do not send confidential information to us via
> electronic mail. This communication is for informational purposes only and
> is
> not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investment product. Any
> information regarding specific investment products is subject to change
> without
> notice. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
> sender
> immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachments
> from
> your system.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> This transmission contains information for the exclusive use of the
> intended
> recipient and may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected
> from
> disclosure. Any unauthorized review or distribution is strictly
> prohibited.
> Our company is required to retain electronic mail messages, which may be
> produced at the request of regulators or in connection with litigation.
> Electronic messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or
> error-free. As
> such, we recommend that you do not send confidential information to us via
> electronic mail. This communication is for informational purposes only and
> is
> not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investment product. Any
> information regarding specific investment products is subject to change
> without
> notice. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
> sender
> immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachments
> from
> your system.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Oct 20 2010 - 06:58:42 ART