Duplex configuration

Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.

Content preview: Dear Experts, I have a small question about the best approach
   into the lab. For duplex configuration on ethernet nics, is best practice
   set switch and router ports staticly to full-duplex or both in auto negociate
   if the question is not explicit? I focus on both, TS and config sections
  for R&S. [...]

Content analysis details: (6.5 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 4.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
                [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?98.138.90.81>]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail
                            (paologoliviera[at]yahoo.com.br)
 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                            CUSTOM_MED
 1.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.4998]
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
Received: from nm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
  (nm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.81]) by groupstudy.com
  (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id o9CMbcPr018470 GroupStudy
  Mailer; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:37:38 -0400
Received: from [98.138.90.53] by nm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with
  NNFMP; 12 Oct 2010 22:37:32 -0000
Received: from [98.138.88.239] by tm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with
  NNFMP; 12 Oct 2010 22:37:32 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1039.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12
  Oct 2010 22:37:32 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 313547.40200.bm_at_omp1039.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 77858 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Oct 2010 22:37:19 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.br;
  s=s1024; t=1286923039;
  bh=XnYz0VQiNHhjnEpIv6H0YnqSfqE1VMtcLZWzrda6oJo=;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=6rg9gUfrmZqaYxmWtZzcOJGovWIKVAOy+9lX1lwp3JgREh1Alvm2ZGgG6fjlAnf2Z41eNkNRKSki8reK3vDSq54BR9g7Kt3i6qCj4wDW2Wz45b1ph8QfRApSEuqp4TrJCIOP8IbqtLt/jf8ehdbTBv2GT63+xwHYRgAoUaXq7h4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;
  d=yahoo.com.br;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=VkmCVUommibFIHRpz2dBV9MMvL6D/Zk/MOv4jGIJWdVKk/nHV2EMgU+Si4zWxodNKznDFp0tVXNuGvxqQTAZ101ecNFoNx0eM4QWnAu36gnPMMGEvtK20Ql7CGA//0Gin8BGUPke+L0UoeFXW+uL9KEXH39Pzu11mEudG5bimpc=;
Message-ID: <903830.77742.qm_at_web120607.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: CA9gvSEVM1klK7ywXGta9kT7jNTDB_f3sMXVDM3l7CP0Sd9
  VLSG0Y0owW9VxRNERN7eul6bIpBBwzmv3lIJGPxjWejsKjMAm0WLsJc9RSec
  uEm.kU2c_OrCD0TO6jrJbr2DsghBgmwW9eT.1xbqa5djfrmsKlzrNo1_Z1oa
  JATsfeqqV6X1Vh7.8nlB_Tg_zyIV0_B82FA1OVg--
Received: from [189.122.228.48] by web120607.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via
  HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:37:19 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.106.282862
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paolo Gomes oliveira <paologoliviera_at_yahoo.com.br>
Subject: Duplex configuration
To: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by groupstudy.com id
  o9CMbcPr018470

Dear Experts,

I have a small question about the best approach into the lab.
For duplex configuration on ethernet nics, is best practice set switch and
router ports staticly to full-duplex or both in auto negociate if the question
is not explicit?
I focus on both, TS and config sections for R&S.

Thanks for share your knowledge.

Paolo.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 12 2010 - 15:37:19 ART