Re: multicast helper map and ip directed-broadcast

From: Ryan DeBerry <rdeberry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:59:00 -0400

Ok, if you dont have the ip directed broadcast on R4 f0/0 where will the
broadcast go?

No mans land

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> ip multicast helper-map 224.1.1.1 10.1.45.255 100
>
>
>
> Access list looks like this:
>
> access-list 100 permit udp host 10.1.12.1 any eq rip
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan DeBerry [mailto:rdeberry_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 12-Oct-10 10:38
> *To:* Jack Router
> *Cc:* Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: multicast helper map and ip directed-broadcast
>
>
>
> On R4's serial link
>
> what does your helper-map look like?
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> I have a question regarding directed broadcast in multicast helper map: Why
> "ip directed-broadcast" is needed on R4 int F0/0? It does not work without
> it.
> For those who use Narbik workbooks it is about Vol2, Multicast, Lab 10.
>
> Topology:
>
> R1(F0/0)---(F0/0)R2--frame--R3--frame--R4(F0/0)---(F0/0)R5
>
> Multicast runs on R2, R3, R4
> R1 is configured to send broadcast updates.
>
> When I debug ip packets on R5 I see that R5 receives RIP updates from R1
> with destination address of 255.255.255.255. There is no 10.1.45.255 in the
> debug:
>
> *Mar 1 10:31:30.717: IP: s=10.1.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0), d=255.255.255.255,
> len 52, rcvd 2
>
> Why then ip directed-broadcast is needed in R4 F0/0 ? What it does ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 12 2010 - 10:59:00 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART