On 10 October 2010 14:53, Garth Bryden
<hacked.the.planet.on.28.8k.dialup_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Group,
>
> I have a switch running BGP that is doing some weird behaviour, that I just
> dont understand....
>
> I am receiving routes from my neighbor (iBGP) but they will not go into the
> route table as they keep coming up that my next hop is inaccessible, but the
> next hop is accessible via a default route... will the recursive routing not
> function correctly with a default route in use?
BGP is not able to use the default route for next-hop recursion, as
you found out yourself. ;) This is as expected.
To fix it, either set the advertising router to set the next-hop to
itself. Or on the receiving router a route-map with set ip next-hop
(which may require recursion ;)). Or advertise the subnet/prefix where
the next-hop is into your igp.
HTH!
-- Wouter Prins wp_at_null0.nl CCIE #25628 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Oct 10 2010 - 16:23:40 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:05 ART