Re: Interpreting my rack number

From: Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:03:48 +0100

Yes, Anthony is right. I saw someone put up their hand and when the
proctor caught his eye the student asked the proctor to come over to
his desk.

The proctor scowled at him and told him to come to the front, where he
made it clear that if he needed something
he should come to the front and ask.

On 9 October 2010 13:57, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com> wrote:
> You go up to the proctor and they can Remote Desktop to your system.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry H [mailto:larryh12203_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: Anthony Sequeira
> Cc: Ccie Makai; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Interpreting my rack number
>
> Anthony
> Your comment really raised a thought in my finite mind. Back in the day, I when I had a question, I would grab my test folder and march up to the proctors desk and discuss the question.
> Now that the exam is all on the monitor, I guess now you raise your hand and the proctor comes to you?
> Maybe there is a button to push that sends up the bat signal and a red phone to call the proctor from your cube:-) (old bat man reference in case you didn't follow).
> Seriously, when a candidate has a question, what is the procedure to get the proctor to come over and discuss the question?
>
> Thanks
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com> wrote:
>
>> The one that always freaked me out...
>>
>> IPv6 Section
>> 2001:12:Y::/64
>>
>> Luckily I was on Rack 5 when I passed so not much of an issue. :)
>>
>> Cisco has been getting better at ridding the exams of these little issues or coding the grading script to accept either approach...also keep in mind that the proctors will get the same question over and over again about an ambiguity, so they should be poised and ready to help.
>>
>> A student reported to me recently that the proctor cut him off almost immediately as he was pointing to a diagram on screen and gave him the answer before he got the question out.
>>
>> This was something that Cisco had not solved adequately in the Pearson Vue experiment, in my humble opinion.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of Ccie Makai
>> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:40 PM
>> To: Cisco certification
>> Subject: Interpreting my rack number
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Just trying to be very very sure on a couple of points before i go take my test. If i am rack 2, and asked the following later on in the task, how would i interpret them:
>>
>> 1. ip address is in the format 148.1.yy.x where x is your router
>> number and yy the rack number. i am thinking 148.1.2.x
>>
>> 2. BGP AS/OSPF/EIGRP process number is 50yy. i am thinking 5002, but could this be 502?
>>
>> 3.ACL/vrf/et al name: eg vrf name ccie6yy: ccie602? ccie62?
>>
>> Of course always good to clarify from the proctor, but just want to be sure before. And feel free to clarify some other caveats when it comes to numbering with regards to the rack number if i dont have it on here.
>>
>> Hope this is not NDA material.
>>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Mak.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Oct 09 2010 - 14:03:48 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:05 ART