The one that always freaked me out...
IPv6 Section
2001:12:Y::/64
Luckily I was on Rack 5 when I passed so not much of an issue. :)
Cisco has been getting better at ridding the exams of these little issues or coding the grading script to accept either approach...also keep in mind that the proctors will get the same question over and over again about an ambiguity, so they should be poised and ready to help.
A student reported to me recently that the proctor cut him off almost immediately as he was pointing to a diagram on screen and gave him the answer before he got the question out.
This was something that Cisco had not solved adequately in the Pearson Vue experiment, in my humble opinion.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ccie Makai
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:40 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Interpreting my rack number
Hi everyone,
Just trying to be very very sure on a couple of points before i go take my test. If i am rack 2, and asked the following later on in the task, how would i interpret them:
1. ip address is in the format 148.1.yy.x where x is your router number and yy the rack number. i am thinking 148.1.2.x
2. BGP AS/OSPF/EIGRP process number is 50yy. i am thinking 5002, but could this be 502?
3.ACL/vrf/et al name: eg vrf name ccie6yy: ccie602? ccie62?
Of course always good to clarify from the proctor, but just want to be sure before. And feel free to clarify some other caveats when it comes to numbering with regards to the rack number if i dont have it on here.
Hope this is not NDA material.
thanks
Mak.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Oct 08 2010 - 17:20:12 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:05 ART