Re: Route Tagging with Default Route

Gary, not sure if I understand?

the route is originated in OSPF using default-information-originate,
but the routes are not being tagged when they are redistributed into
RIP. Did you get this the wrong way round below or am I
misunderstanding you?

On 7 October 2010 14:50, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> if the route is originated by OSPF, then it will not be 'tagged' as RIP
> routes are sent into OSPF...
>
> is there a way to make the default a RIP route and see if the tag shows up
> after redistribution?
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> Hope someone can help me out.
>>
>> I am redistributing routes into RIP from OSPF. I have a route-map that
>> sets a tag on the routes as they are redistributed into RIP.
>> The problem is that all the routes seem to be tagged apart from the
>> default route. The default route which is originated in OSPF always
>> seems to have a tag of "0" when I debug RIP updates, however all the
>> other routes have the correct tag of "110"
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 15:01:32 ART