Re: MPLS doubts

From: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 02:30:59 +1000

Unbelievable.

But i agree with Paul that Marko was correct.

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Carlos is correct. Although it is multi-access, they behave like
> point-to-point. The neighbors are unique even if they have the same label.
> This is what Marko was trying to say also.
> --
> Paul Negron
> CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
> Senior Technical Instructor
> www.micronicstraining.com
>
>
>
> > From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:55:35 -0300
> > To: <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
> > Cc: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, Marko Milivojevic
> > <markom_at_ipexpert.com>, Vincent Tay <vtay.75_at_gmail.com>,
> > "Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Subject: Re: MPLS doubts
> >
> > Even if it is multiple access, the LDP adjacencies are point to point,
> > and labels are related to the specific neighbour. No ambiguity there, so
> > no need to negotiate.
> >
> > On the other hand, labels are usually (frame mode) platform wide, so if
> > you have multiple links between two routers, the labels are ok even for
> > different interfaces.
> >
> > -Carlos
> >
> > ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com @ 29/9/2010 8:45 -0300 dixit:
> >> What if the igp routes are for different subnets, then there isn't a
> best
> >> route, you'd have 2 best routes.
> >>
> >> I'd think some type of negotiation would occur between routers for
> these
> >> types of scenarios where labels might overlap.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>
> >> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:02:30
> >> To: Marko Milivojevic<markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> >> Reply-To: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Vincent Tay<vtay.75_at_gmail.com>;
> >> Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> >> Subject: Re: MPLS doubts
> >>
> >> Very funny Marko!! But very True.
> >> The peer will still use the label from the mpls neighbor where the best
> past
> >> was chosen by the igp .....even if it's the same interface. I was stuck
> in
> >> point to point mode!
> >>
> >> Sorry such a late response but I was in a car accident today, lost my
> wallet
> >> and my phone stop working. Day from Hell man!!!
> >
> > --
> > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Sep 30 2010 - 02:30:59 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:06 ART