Re: MPLS doubts

Neighbor specific...that clears up the picture...thanks.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:55:35
To: <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Negron<negron.paul_at_gmail.com>; Marko Milivojevic<markom_at_ipexpert.com>; Vincent Tay<vtay.75_at_gmail.com>; Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: MPLS doubts

Even if it is multiple access, the LDP adjacencies are point to point,
and labels are related to the specific neighbour. No ambiguity there, so
no need to negotiate.

On the other hand, labels are usually (frame mode) platform wide, so if
you have multiple links between two routers, the labels are ok even for
different interfaces.

-Carlos

ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com @ 29/9/2010 8:45 -0300 dixit:
> What if the igp routes are for different subnets, then there isn't a best route, you'd have 2 best routes.
>
> I'd think some type of negotiation would occur between routers for these types of scenarios where labels might overlap.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:02:30
> To: Marko Milivojevic<markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> Reply-To: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Vincent Tay<vtay.75_at_gmail.com>; Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: MPLS doubts
>
> Very funny Marko!! But very True.
> The peer will still use the label from the mpls neighbor where the best past
> was chosen by the igp .....even if it's the same interface. I was stuck in
> point to point mode!
>
> Sorry such a late response but I was in a car accident today, lost my wallet
> and my phone stop working. Day from Hell man!!!

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net