The sharing of load is done in a more restricted form like per packet or
per destination
The Load Balancing is done more dynamically based on the actual load of the
traffic.
per packet load sharing is *not* a recommended method in most cases as that
may cause high packet reordering and the per destination can be not
so efficient as once the router selected a path for a destination it will
not change it even if the load will be extremely high to that destination.
Cisco router's do load sharing and not load balancing
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:54 AM, CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey can anyone tell me the difference between Load sharing and Load
> Balancing
> In one workbook i noticed Load sharing and load balancing r more or less
> same
> Can anyone spot out the difference?
>
> --
> With Warmest Regards,
>
> CCIE KID
> IN PURSUIT OF CCIE
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 JNCIA-ER CCIE #20572 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3 http://twitter.com/cciep3 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Sep 22 2010 - 11:25:09 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART