RE: Frame-Relay related query

From: Sonu Khandelwal (sokhande) <sokhande_at_cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:14:06 +0530

You can atom (xconnect over frame-relay interface)
You can also do bridging.

Thanks,
Sonu

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Muhammad Adeel
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:34 PM
To: Pornthep_CCIE
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Frame-Relay related query

Hi,

Thanks for your input. Actually, I am looking for a solution where we
can
not use the IP address also the IP unnumbered on physical and virtual
interface (sub-interfce, virtual-template, multilink). Is there any
other
way ?

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Pornthep_CCIE
<pornthep.ccie_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Has one way to do it.
>
>
> interface Serial1/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> serial restart-delay 0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template1
>
> interface Virtual-Template1
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
> and on interface Virtual-Template1, you can use ppp authen
[chap|pap|esp]
> to
> do authentication on this interface as well if you want.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Muhammad Adeel
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:30 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Frame-Relay related query
>
> Hi Experts,
>
>
>
> Is there any way to use frame-relay link without assigning IP on this
> interface/sub-interface and also without using unnumbered command.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 09 2010 - 16:14:06 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART