Re: MPLS PE to PE Question

That is correct. BGP transit rules still apply to the PE route propagation.
Route-Reflectors are supported under the VPNv4 context.

-- 
Paul Negron
CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
Senior Technical Instructor
www.micronicstraining.com
> From: Muhammad Anser Khan <manserkhan_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Muhammad Anser Khan <manserkhan_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:31:40 +0300
> To: Marcin Zgola <MZgola_at_netrixllc.com>
> Cc: "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: MPLS PE to PE Question
> 
> Dear Marcin,
> 
> You can configure a Route-Reflector in MB-iBGP ( b/w PEs) to avoid full mesh
> peering.
> 
> Regards,
> Anser
> 
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Marcin Zgola <MZgola_at_netrixllc.com> wrote:
> 
>> I am not MPLS expert but I have a questions about PE to PE MP-BGP setup.
>> 
>> In simple lab
>> 
>> PE-P-PE , I know I have to have MP_BGP Setup between these PE routers in
>> order
>> to route VRF from one to the other.
>> 
>> What about if I have a topology that is separated via multiple  P routers,
>> and
>> I have 6 sites (6 PE Routers) I have to have fully meshed MP-BGP config?
>> 
>> 
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net