Re: CCIE R^S BLUE PRINT

Jason,

Cisco TAC still takes cases on all the technologies you mentioned.

As Tyson said, when you're contacted by various customers at different
levels/countries, everyday you see cases that you just CAN'T touch (uhum
upgrade) their massive environment.

Kambiz Agahian
CCIE Instructor/Consultant
M.Eng Telecom, CCIE# 25341, CCSI# 33326, MCSE, MCSA

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Jason Aarons (US) <
jason.aarons_at_us.didata.com> wrote:

> Where have you been that you saw DECNET or Banyan Vines or IPX/SPX or
> AppleTalk actually being used?
>
> That would be those shops still running RIPv1?
>
> Maybe the Sysop died atop a US Robotics 28.8 modem in 1996 and they didn't
> hire anyone to replace him or the Token Ring...
>
> In reality I might see IBM SNA/AS 400 once a year, that's about it. Seems
> IBM charges an arm/leg for TCP printing from AS400.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Kambiz Agahian
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 4:12 PM
> To: Adrian Brayton
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: CCIE R^S BLUE PRINT
>
> Well, many organizations still HAVE to use them. You still see things like
> DECNET around ;)
>
> Kambiz Agahian
> CCIE Instructor/Consultant
> M.Eng Telecom, CCIE# 25341, CCSI# 33326, MCSE, MCSA
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Adrian Brayton <abrayton_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > And don't think that they wont have any legacy crap on there either...
> >
> > Who ever wrote that lab that I got, put a few things in there that
> > made you want to slap his momma!
> >
> >
> > On Aug 30, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Kambiz Agahian wrote:
> >
> > > UY,
> > >
> > > The only topic that they've removed from the QoS section of the
> > > blueprint
> > is
> > > "*3550 ; Quality of Service Configuration*" - all other sub-sections
> > > hold good and they have got to be pursued with apostolic zeal!
> > >
> > > HTH
> > >
> > > Kambiz Agahian
> > > CCIE Instructor/Consultant
> > > M.Eng Telecom, CCIE# 25341, CCSI# 33326, MCSE, MCSA On Mon, Aug 30,
> > >2010 at 12:49 PM, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Please keep in mind that Cisco added these legacy methods to their
> > version
> > >> of my Expanded Study Blueprint. So - Cisco expects CCIE students to
> > >> know those.
> > >>
> > >> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>
> > >> On Aug 30, 2010, at 3:32 PM, CCIE UY <ccieuy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi people, i have a doubt about the blue print.
> > >>>
> > >>> In the official cisco blueprint, legacy QoS topics like CQ, PQ,
> > >>> FRTS
> > >> are
> > >>> not mention but this are in the INE expanded blue print.
> > >>>
> > >>> Is posible to see this legacy Qos Methods in the real lab if arent
> > >> mention
> > >>> in the official blue print?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards.
> > >>>
> > >>> UY.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>>
> > >>> __________________________________________________________________
> > >>> _____ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >> ___________________________________________________________________
> > >> ____ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 30 2010 - 22:32:46 ART