Re: Stop a nuclear disaster

Ok I'm waiting for the world to end...while that's happening I'm gong to have another pitcher of the awesome beer I'm drinking!

Josh
CCIE 16024

On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:05 PM, <balavignesh002_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> similar future email. If you have any questions, see
> admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.
>
> Content preview: Hi Cisco certification, Our leaders are putting the nation
> at stake for the nuclear liability bill. The Standing Committee looking at
> the bill has submitted its recommendations to the Parliament. In its current
> form the bill limits the liability for operator of the nuclear facility in
> case of a nuclear accident. If the cost exceeds the limit we will have to
> pay for it. The Standing Committee has ignored the demand for unlimited liability
> which would have made the bill more competent. [...]
>
> Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (balavignesh002[at]gmail.com)
> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
> CUSTOM_MED
> 1.6 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
> 1.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
> [score: 0.5000]
> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
> 0.0 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags
> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
>
> The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
> open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
> or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
> it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
> Received: from greenpeace.in (greenidol.in [70.32.90.231] (may be
> forged)) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
> o7Q3BKxH006391 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:11:20 -0400
> Received: (qmail 23576 invoked by uid 48); 26 Aug 2010 04:35:42 +0530
> Date: 26 Aug 2010 04:35:42 +0530
> Message-ID: <20100825230542.23572.qmail_at_greenpeace.in>
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Stop a nuclear disaster
> X-PHP-Script: safefoodnow.org/tyf/importer-nukes-rr.php for 219.64.77.60
> From: <balavignesh002_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: balavignesh002_at_gmail.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by GroupStudy
>
> Hi Cisco certification,
>
> Our leaders are putting the nation at stake for the nuclear liability
> bill. The Standing Committee looking at the bill has submitted its
> recommendations to the Parliament.
>
> In its current form the bill limits the liability for operator of the
> nuclear facility in case of a nuclear accident. If the cost exceeds the
> limit we will have to pay for it. The Standing Committee has ignored the
> demand for unlimited liability which would have made the bill more
> competent.
>
> Our leaders have not learnt anything from the injustices of Bhopal. Prime
> Minister Manmohan Singh, eager to get this bill cleared needs to know
> that we want unlimited liability. I have already sent him an email asking
> him to incorporate unlimited liability in the bill. A large number of
> emails demanding the same will make it difficult for him to ignore us. We
> have very little time to make this change.
>
> Can you also write to PM Manmohan Singh asking him to incorporate
> unlimited liability?
>
> http://www.greenpeace.org/india/unlimited-liability
>
> Thanks!
>
> balavignesh002_at_gmail.com
>
> You are receiving this email because someone you know sent it to you from
> the Greenpeace site. Greenpeace retains no information about individuals
> contacted through its site, and will not send you further messages
> without your consent -- although your friends could, of course, send you
> another message.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 25 2010 - 20:15:41 ART