Re: retry limit exceeded -MSG

From: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:00:54 -0600

ALL,

I just want to say Thank You for ALL of your input on this Forum. I have
learned a lot from you guys over the last couple of months.
I know I was not very vocal in the beginning. Your thirst for knowledge has
inspired me and has an impact on my work.

I thank you very much for that.

There's a lot of smart people on this forum....yes....even Carlos.
Ha Ha HA Ha Ha!!!

Keep the knowledge flowing. I'll try to be a better listener.

:-)

Paul

-- 
Paul Negron
CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
Senior Technical Instructor
www.micronicstraining.com
> From: --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0500
> To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: retry limit exceeded  -MSG
> 
> Paul,
>      Are you saying there are differences in reliability/stability
> running straight dynamips as opposed to running GNS3 and all it's glory
> gui? Just trying to understand the statement.
> 
> --Hammer--
> 
> 
> On 8/25/2010 11:34 AM, Paul Negron wrote:
>> I would just run straight Dynamips. It has done me very little wrong since
>> its inception. If you need help with it, let me know.
>> 
>> Paul
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 25 2010 - 11:00:54 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:53 ART