RE: Not the cleanest configuration but it works

From: Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:09:31 -0400

Thanks, I guess I still need to learn how to read with my finger on the
screen J

 

 

From: Manouchehr Omari [mailto:manouchehr1979_at_gmail.com]
Sent: 19-Aug-10 13:16
To: Jack Router
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Not the cleanest configuration but it works

 

 

 

I guess if they ask you use the minimum line of config in that case you
gonna lose points with your config otherwise everything is cool.

 

Cheers,

Manny

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

What if I apply a configuration that meets requirements, works correctly but
is not the shortest config possible. Will it be accepted in the Lab ? Here
is an example from my workbook. The task says to filter routes on R1 that
originated in AS 300

>>>>> My solution :
!
ip as-path access-list 300 permit _300$
!
route-map AS300 deny 10
 match as-path 300
route-map AS300 permit 999
!
router bgp 100
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 route-map AS300 in
!

>>>>> Workbook solution :
!
ip as-path access-list 300 deny _300$
ip as-path access-list 300 permit .*
!
router bgp 100
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 filter-list 300 in
!

Both solutions work OK but mine includes an unnecessary route-map.
Would my "longer" solution be accepted ? Or it all depends how the proctor
feels that day :)

Thanks

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 19 2010 - 14:09:31 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART