Re: Was multicast routing behavior changed in new 15.0T code?

From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:15:23 -0300

Jorge,
have you received any info on this ?
CEF forwarding for mcast seems a new feature of 15, and it would be
nice to have a piece of documentation describing it.
I see that CEF can be disabled on *output* to an interface... strange.
Please post your findings !

-Carlos

Jorge Cortes @ 16/8/2010 23:57 -0300 dixit:
> Hi Armin,
>
> Thanks for taking the time for looking and responding to this query. The
> racks I use for studying were upgraded to 15.0 code two weeks ago. Those
> have the full license set, I'm sure of it.
> My question however is more focused on the actual behavior, which looks like
> it has been changed. It looks like you have to disable Multicast CEF for the
> routers to learn the RP mappings, and also a tunnel interface is now
> created. At least this is what I observed while going thru this exercise,
> but I am just curious to know if anybody has tried this and what are the
> outcomes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jorge
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Armin Mirsepassi <amirsepassi_at_ccgrp.com>wrote:
>
>> Jorge,
>>
>> 15.x Quick read faq:
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps10587/ps10591/p
>> s10621/qa_c67_561940.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps10587/ps10591/p%0As10621/qa_c67_561940.html>
>>
>> I havnt bought or used 15.x with ISR Gen 1, I will take a risk and assume
>> it's the same as with Gen 2, unless im missing something. Look at pictures
>> in below ordering doc for a little better explanation of the license
>> features, pretty much same as above.
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps10598/ordering_guide_c0
>> 7_557736_ps10537_Products_Data_Sheet.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps10598/ordering_guide_c0%0A7_557736_ps10537_Products_Data_Sheet.html>
>>
>> Otherwise use the feature navigator tool (http://www.cisco.com/go/fn) to
>> make sure everything you need is available with the licenses you have
>> purchased.
>>
>> If you're using for studies you can request a temp 60 day license
>> (http://www.cisco.com/go/license click temp license link at top of page)
>>
>> Armin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Jorge Cortes
>> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 1:06 PM
>> To: Cisco certification
>> Subject: Was multicast routing behavior changed in new 15.0T code?
>>
>> Hi GS Gurus.
>>
>> Just ran into an strange issue with multicast routing where the router
>> wasn't getting the RP mapping information. The topology is very simple as
>> it
>> is a daisy chain and no RPF failures:
>>
>> SW---SW(RP)---SW---R
>>
>> Router interface configuration
>>
>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>> ip address 61.61.128.193 255.255.255.224
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> ip ospf mtu-ignore
>> duplex auto
>> speed auto
>> ipv6 address 2001:61:100::4/64
>> ipv6 rip RIPNG enable
>> !
>>
>> R4(config)#do sh ip pim rp map
>> PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
>>
>> R4(config)#
>>
>> So I turned on "debug ip mpacket" on the router to see what was going on,
>> and also tried to disable "mroute cache" as follows:
>>
>> R4(config)#int fa0/1
>> R4(config-if)#no ip mroute-ca
>> The above command is going to be deprecated. Use MFIB commands instead.
>>
>> Well, looks like this command is not supported anymore, so lets use the new
>> MFIB commands.
>>
>> R4(config-if)#no ip mfib ?
>> cef Multicast CEF to/from interface
>> forwarding Multicast forwarding to/from interface
>>
>> Not sure the difference between both, so will disable both. The final
>> configuration of the interface looks as follows:
>>
>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>> ip address 61.61.128.193 255.255.255.224
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> no ip mfib forwarding input
>> no ip mfib forwarding output
>> no ip mfib cef input
>> no ip mfib cef output
>> ip ospf mtu-ignore
>> duplex auto
>> speed auto
>> ipv6 address 2001:61:100::4/64
>> ipv6 rip RIPNG enable
>> !
>>
>> And right after I'm done with that configuration -which was suppossed to be
>> used only for debugging purposes- I get the following message:
>>
>> R4(config-if)#
>> *Aug 15 22:54:16.490: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
>> Tunnel0, changed state to up
>>
>> And now the RP mappings appear to be working:
>>
>> R4(config-if)#do sh ip pim rp map
>> PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
>>
>> Group(s) 239.10.5.0/24
>> RP 150.1.9.9 (?), v2v1
>> Info source: 150.1.10.10 (?), elected via Auto-RP
>> Uptime: 00:01:52, expires: 00:02:05
>>
>> Not sure what exactly is going on with the new code, but I had never seen
>> this before. First looks like the behavior is now like in IPv6 multicast,
>> where a tunnel interface is created, but I don't understand why it was
>> necessary to turn off MFIB for it to work.
>>
>> Is anybody aware of this behavior? I couldn't find it documented.
>>
>> R4(config-if)#do sh ver
>> Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version
>> 15.0(1)M2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 18 2010 - 12:15:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART