Hi All,
force - I think using this option is a good choice, because we need to
ensure that there will not be any issues with router-id after reload etc.
label range - I believe we need to use this only when explicitly asked.
Thanks,
Srinivas
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Hash <hashng_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Just know the difference between using force and none and be ready to give
> them just what they ask for.
> Hash
> Sent from my BlackBerry. wireless device from STC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:30:06
> To: Muhammad Anser Khan<manserkhan_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco Group<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Use LDP router-id "force" and "Label range"
>
> I wouldnt do anything that they dont ask you to do. The questions will be
> pretty self explanatory so you shouldnt have an issue.
>
> CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Muhammad Anser Khan
> <manserkhan_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Dear Experts,
> >
> > Can we use "force" keyword when defining mpls router-id as a best
> practice
> > in the CCIE SP lab exam whether they ask or not and Label range command
> as
> > well?
> >
> > Please advice.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anser
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 16 2010 - 23:49:50 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART