In this case you actually don't want your stack master to have an
uplink connected to it, so make it one of the switches in the middle.
In the event of a failure of the master, you wouldn't want to have a
convergence event and stack master re-election at the same time.
Ronnie
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Usama Pervaiz <chaudri_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone knew what the best position for the stack
> master is in the stack. Our average stack will be 5 to 6 deep and the
> top and bottom switch will be up linked to distribution. Would it make
> sense to make the top one master with the highest priority and the
> bottom switch with the 2nd highest so it becomes master if the master
> goes down, or does this at all matter in any way?
>
> Your input in this will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Ronald Angello Senior Network Architect CCIE 17846 CCDP, CCIP, CCNP Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Aug 12 2010 - 22:49:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART