Re: IGMP join-group vs static-group

Spot on garry :)

On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:43 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipmulti/command/reference/imc_02.html#wp1048059
>
> "When you configure the *ip igmp static-group* command, packets to the group
> are fast-switched out the interface"
>
> so use the static-group when you always want the group to be avaliable but
> do not want the router interface to be a member and respond to the group
> address
>
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM, masroor ali <masror.ali_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> ip igmp join-group
>> ip igmp static-group
>>
>> As these above command are used for testing purposes, the join-command is
>> used where we need response for testing, e.g ping, but where would we use
>> the static-group command?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Masroor Ali
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Aug 08 2010 - 14:25:51 ART