Re: INE Workbook

From: Bilal Hansrod <bilal.hansrod_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:31:30 +1000

Thanks Garth,

I still couldn't get my head around of using the dummy route. How come it
disappear from R4 routing table when I am unable to reach BB3. I did in past
used sla monitor on ASA but I was tracking my defaut route and switch to
backup route if the destination is unreachable.

Sorry for the pain, but can I do without dummy route. Is it done via dummy
route, because I don't have static default route.'

Thanks,

Bilal

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Garth Bryden <
hacked.the.planet.on.28.8k.dialup_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hiya,
>
> They use a dummy which will be removed from the route table if the SLA
> fails.. this is because they need to use a static route to configure the
> tracking with... you could probably use a default route as the dummy route
> pointing to null0 since that is purpose of the advertisement anyway.. I
> guess it doesn't really matter as long as it doesn't leak into the rest of
> your routing domain or outside and doesn't affect your routing!
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bilal Hansrod <bilal.hansrod_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was doing INE workbook 1 and was bit lost in one of the technology lab.
>> The topic is RIPv2 Reliable Conditional Default Routing in which I
>> couldn't
>> understand why DUMMY route was used to track the reachability of BB3. Any
>> thoughts -
>>
>> Bilal
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Aug 07 2010 - 15:31:30 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART