Re: Cannot ping VRF destination

From: Garth Bryden <hacked.the.planet.on.28.8k.dialup_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:48:53 +0800

Great, glad u got it!

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:25 AM, syed zubair ahmad <s_zubair82_at_yahoo.com>wrote:

> wohoo solved it guys, it was a configuration fault R6 was not adverstising
> the
> labes for its local prefixes.
>
> Thank you all for the helpful responses,
>
> Regards, Zubair
>
>
> --- On Mon, 2/8/10, Eduard Gheorghiu <edigheorghiu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Eduard Gheorghiu <edigheorghiu_at_gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Cannot ping VRF destination
> To: "syed zubair ahmad" <s_zubair82_at_yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Group Study" <comserv_at_groupstudy.com>, "Group Study"
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Date: Monday, 2 August, 2010, 14:02
>
> Hi,
>
> I would do a trace between R5 and R6 loopbacks to see that MPLS is enabled
> along the paths (you should see labels on all hops but last).
>
> R5#trace 155.1.6.6 source 155.1.5.5
> R6#trace 155.1.5.5 source 155.1.6.6
>
> than I would check the CEF on both PEs to see that 2 labels are applied for
> the destinations:
>
> R5#sh ip cef vrf VPN_A 155.1.67.0 detail
> R6#sh ip cef vrf VPN_B 155.1.58.0 detail
>
>
> Regards,
> Eduard
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Aug 03 2010 - 18:48:53 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART