Re: quick question on eigrp updates

From: Garth Bryden <hacked.the.planet.on.28.8k.dialup_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:43:23 +0800

I meant interface not internet \_/

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Garth Bryden <
hacked.the.planet.on.28.8k.dialup_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> When you configure the network statement in EIGRP and OSPF you are not
> enabling it to advertise the "network" as per say but you are enabling it on
> the internet and the routing protocol works out the mask to send in the
> update based on the subnet mask configured under with the ip address under
> the interface.
>
> Using this logic you could
>
> network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 to advertise a eigrp updates out an interface
> configured with the ip 1.1.1.1
>
> if the mask you have configured for that ip address is 255.255.255.0 then
> the route update will be sent as a /24 to your eigrp neighbors.
>
> :-) HTH
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:33 PM, masroor ali <masror.ali_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> anyone have any clue in this regard???
>>
>>
>> Do not send EIGRP packets out any other interfaces; do not use the
>> passive-interface command to accomplish this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Masroor Ali
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 31 2010 - 19:43:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 19:19:15 ART