Antonio,
Let's see the issue from this point of view; what if you have 10 BGP sites
with the same AS number connected back to a provider? (like a Uni with a
public AS number and 10 campuses connected to AT&T) what would you do to get
things done in terms of normal updates? allowas-in or as-override solutions
right? did you notice that you almost killed the native BGP loop prevention
mechanism ? :)
HTH
Kambiz Agahian
CCIE Instructor/Consultant
CCIE# 25341, CCSI# 33326, MCSE, MCSA
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Antonio Saez <
antonio.saez.jimenez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't understand the bgp SoO community. Imagine an scenario with two PE
> routers speaking VPNv4 iBGP, 2 CE routers speaking iBGP and each PE router
> speaking eBGP with on CE router. If one CE router send a prefix to the PE
> router, and the Pe router to the other PE, then when the PE would send the
> update to the CE, this CE router would discard the prefix because It would
> see its AS in the AS Path.
>
> Please, tell me if I am wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 15 2010 - 10:02:02 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 19:19:15 ART