Re: OSPF Network Statement

generally when its asked this way they dont want the interface included
directly in the ospf process

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Marcelo Rosa <MRosa_at_multirede.com.br>wrote:

> Hi people.
>
> There4s a question in my lab t elling me to insert interface E0/1 in the
> OSPF
> process, without using the "network" command under the ospf process.
>
> My solution was this:
>
> interface Ethernet0/1
> ip address 183.10.6.6 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf 1 area 46
> full-duplex
> !
> router ospf 1
> router-id 150.10.6.6
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 150.10.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
> network 183.10.46.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
>
> The lab guide solution was a lot more complicated:
>
> router ospf 1
> router-id 150.1.6.6
> network 150.1.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
> network 183.1.46.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
> redistribute connected route-map CONNECTED->OSPF subnets
> !
> ip prefix-list VLAN_6 permit 183.1.6.0/24
> !
> route-map CONNECTED->OSPF permit 10
> match ip address prefix-list VLAN_6
>
>
> So, my question is: Am I crazy? Isn4t my solution a clearly simpler and
> more
> performing solution, without the need for a route-map? Or maybe there4s a
> difference in the be haviour of the two solutions?
>
> Thks in advance.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 28 2010 - 23:33:56 ART