Re: no ip next-hop-self eigrp 90

From: garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:04:22 +0300

what does your routing table look like with and without the command?

that should show you what it is doing if it is "working" or not...

--
Garry L. Baker
"There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Taufik Kurniawan <ktaufik_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008014bcd7.shtml
>
>
> What is the purpose of " *no ip next-hop-self eigrp 90* " ? even if i
> remove
> ... still i got connectivity
>
> *interface Tunnel0
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip redirects
> ip mtu 1440
> ip nhrp authentication cisco123
> ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
> ip nhrp network-id 1
> no ip split-horizon eigrp 90
> no ip next-hop-self eigrp 90
> tunnel source FastEthernet0/0
> tunnel mode gre multipoint
> tunnel key 0
> tunnel protection ipsec profile cisco*
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 31 2010 - 19:04:22 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 19:19:15 ART