Re: enabling OSPF process under interface [7:139150]

Hey Brad! Brilliant!

I had forgotten about that one. While the section command quickly shows if
there is the network command in use in conjunction with interface level
commands, your suggestion makes the effect of such commands (and others)
perfectly clear. What an awesome way to quickly discover what is going on in a
complex topology that we have suddenly inherited:

Rack10R2#sh ip ospf int brief
Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C
Lo22 1 1 10.10.22.22/24 1 LOOP 0/0
Lo0 1 1 10.10.2.2/24 1 LOOP 0/0
Se0/0.12 1 1 10.10.12.2/24 64 P2P 1/1
Fa0/0 1 1 10.10.28.2/24 1 DR 1/1
Rack10R2#

It is so unfortunate that show run section does not detail which interfaces
protocol-related commands are listed under.

On Jul 1, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Brad Edgeworth wrote:

> I prefer:
>
> Show Ip osp int brief
>
> Comes in handy on my Enterprise Edge routers when they sit in a variety of
areas from my WAN links
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com>
wrote:
> Yes - definitely!
>
> And please, I was not trying to be insensitive to how difficult the
Troubleshooting section is.
>
> A great command on the routers to quickly check for this type of thing would
be:
>
> show run | section ospf
>
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:51 PM, masroor ali wrote:
>
> > no one knows when fun part change into mess. :)
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com>
wrote:
> >
> >> This seems like it would be fun in a Trouble Ticket!
> >>
> >> On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:27 PM, masroor ali wrote:
> >>
> >>> if you are asking about this scenario,
> >>>
> >>> router ospf 1
> >>> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 100
> >>> int fa0/0
> >>> ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> >>> ip ospf area 0
> >>>
> >>> the interface one will get the preference. here area 0 would be enabled
> >> on
> >>> interface fa0/0
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Tim Choe <choetim_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is it possible to enable OSPF under the interface as oppose to
enabling
> >>>> globally? If both are enabled, which one will take precedence?
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Masroor Ali
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Masroor Ali
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 01 2010 - 19:46:30 ART