Re: Unnumbered and Virtual Links

When I started the conversation I had read the same RFC and some posts
in other forums and this is what led me to believe
that this was not possible. Then when I labbed everything up and it
didn't work I assumed that they were right.
Then when you came back and said you had made it work I was surprised.
If you do write a blog about this I would love to be
the first to read it!!!
And thanks for looking at this.

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 17:57, Yaseen Mirza <yaseengs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fair enough, I will lab it up at work on Monday on real kit and see
>> what I get aswell, I would be interested to know
>> your findings if you do get round to it.
>> I had seen problems in Dynamips with switchports but never any
>> problems with routing protocols.
>
> I've seen just about everything. But, I'm having my doubts now. The
> RFC I quoted earlier also warns about the situation when both links
> are unnumbered and that it may happen that VL doesn't come up. This is
> an interesting exercise. I think I will research it a little bit more
> and write a blog about it.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 17 2010 - 21:03:26 ART