Re: OSPF Network Statement

Hi Marcelo,
maybe we are working on the same Lab, but I'm not sure. My task ask me to
advertise VLAN6 and "not use the network or ip ospf statements".
Redistribution was my solution, because others break the requirements.

Apologize if we are not working on the same lab.
Regards,
-mirco.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Marcelo Rosa <MRosa_at_multirede.com.br>wrote:

> Hi people.
>
> There4s a question in my lab t elling me to insert interface E0/1 in the
> OSPF
> process, without using the "network" command under the ospf process.
>
> My solution was this:
>
> interface Ethernet0/1
> ip address 183.10.6.6 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf 1 area 46
> full-duplex
> !
> router ospf 1
> router-id 150.10.6.6
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 150.10.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
> network 183.10.46.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
>
> The lab guide solution was a lot more complicated:
>
> router ospf 1
> router-id 150.1.6.6
> network 150.1.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
> network 183.1.46.6 0.0.0.0 area 46
> redistribute connected route-map CONNECTED->OSPF subnets
> !
> ip prefix-list VLAN_6 permit 183.1.6.0/24
> !
> route-map CONNECTED->OSPF permit 10
> match ip address prefix-list VLAN_6
>
>
> So, my question is: Am I crazy? Isn4t my solution a clearly simpler and
> more
> performing solution, without the need for a route-map? Or maybe there4s a
> difference in the be haviour of the two solutions?
>
> Thks in advance.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 29 2010 - 09:49:53 ART