i would say YES it works for me...
Router#sh run int s0/0.1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 138 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.254
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 101
end
Router#ping 1.1.1.1
Router#sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0/31 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/52/92 ms
R5(config-subif)#do sh run int s0/0.1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 138 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.254
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 202
end
R5(config-subif)#do ping 1.1.1.0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.0, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/42/104 ms
R5(config-subif)#do sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0/31 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0.1
-- Garry L. Baker "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Youssif, Ahmed <YoussiffA_at_aecl.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > But can I use it with frame-relay sub-interfaces or I cant > > > > Regards, > > *Ahmed Ossama Youssiff.* > > * * > > *From:* garry baker [mailto:baker.garry_at_gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, July 31, 2010 6:38 PM > *To:* Youssif, Ahmed > *Subject:* Re: /31 mask > > > > if it is a point to point i dont see why not, do not think it will break > anything, that is the proposal of the RFC behind it... > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t2/feature/guide/ft31addr.html > > i have only ever used it on ppp or hdlc links though and only in a lab > environment > > > -- > Garry L. Baker > > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Youssif, Ahmed <YoussiffA_at_aecl.com> > wrote: > > Dears, > Can I use /31 mask on frame-relay interfaces? > When I asked to configure the largest mask possible on frame-relay link, > shall > I use /30 or /31. > > Please respond quickly. > Regards, > Ahmed Ossama Youssiff. > Implementation Manager. > Telecom Systems Business Unit. > Advanced Electronics Company. > PO Box 90916, Riyadh 11623. > Tel: +96612056111 Ext. 7018. > Mobile: +966531567747. > Fax.: +96612059044. > > > This email has been sent from Advanced Electronics Company, Ltd (AEC). The > information in this email and in any files transmitted with it, is intended > only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you > receive > this in error, please contact the sender or postmaster_at_aecl.comimmediately > and delete the material from any computer. This email and its attachments > are > believed to be free of any virus, or defect, but it is the responsibility > of > the recipient to ensure this. AEC accepts no liability for any damage > caused > by any virus transmitted by this email. > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > This email has been sent from Advanced Electronics Company, Ltd (AEC). The > information in this email and in any files transmitted with it, is intended > only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you > receive this in error, please contact the sender or* * > postmaster_at_aecl.com immediately and delete the material from any computer. > This email and its attachments are believed to be free of any virus, or > defect, but it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure this. AEC > accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this > email. Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Jul 31 2010 - 18:56:06 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 19:19:14 ART