RE: Need to undestand local policy

Hi Yemi,
Yes, ping also working fine.

R2#sh ip eig nei
EIGRP-IPv4 neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
                                            (sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 172.16.253.1 Et0/0 11 02:03:33 15 200 0 20
R2#ping 172.16.253.1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.253.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms
R2#

Thanks,
Sonu

-----Original Message-----
From: Yemi Oshunkoya [mailto:yzmar4real_at_hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:15 AM
To: Sonu Khandelwal (sokhande); ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Need to undestand local policy

Hi sokhande,
      Pls discard my last mail, you don't need to apply it on an interface. Can u try doing a ping and see if that gets policy routed?
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

-----Original Message-----
From: yzmar4real_at_hotmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 04:24:25
To: <sokhande_at_cisco.com>; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Reply-To: yzmar4real_at_hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Need to undestand local policy

U didn't apply your policy on any interface. :) Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

-----Original Message-----
From: sokhande_at_cisco.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 04:02:28
To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Need to undestand local policy

Hi All,
I am trying to understand local policy. As per my understanding any packet which is generated by router will get treatment based on local policy. ospf hello/ eigrp hello/ routing updates will all be considered as locally generated packets.

I have created a simple scenerio and this seems to be not working for me.

R1----R2

R1 and R2 are connected back to back using E0/0 interface and are running eigrp between them. I am doing a local policy on R2 such that its next hop gets changed to some junk ip address and no neighborship gets built between these interface. This seems to be not working and I see that policy is not even being hit.

configs of R1:

interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 172.16.253.1 255.255.255.0
end

sh run | b router eigrp
router eigrp 1
 network 172.16.0.0

configs of R2:

R2#sh run | b router eigrp
router eigrp 1
 network 172.16.0.0

R2#
R2#sh run int e0/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 68 bytes
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 172.16.253.2 255.255.255.0
end

!
route-map xxx permit 10
 match ip address 6
 set ip next-hop 19.19.19.1 (some junk ip address) !
!
R2#sh ip access-lists 6
Standard IP access list 6
    10 permit any log (33 matches)

show commands on R1 and R2.

Neighborship is still built and I am not able to understand this behavior.

R2#sh ip eigrp neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
                                            (sec) (ms) Cnt Num 0 172.16.253.1 Et0/0 11 08:43:32 20 200 0 15 R2# 0 ccle ip eig nei erbu-script 06/27 9:21am

R2#cle ip eig nei
*Jun 27 03:51:09.257: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4(0) 1: Neighbor 172.16.253.1

                                                                               
(Ethernet0/0) is down: manually cleared
R2#cle ip eig nei
*Jun 27 03:51:11.001: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4(0) 1: Neighbor 172.16.253.1

                                                                               
(Ethernet0/0) is up: new adjacency
R2#sh ip eigrp neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
                                            (sec) (ms) Cnt Num 0 172.16.253.1 Et0/0 11 00:00:03 15 200 0 20

Can you please help me here?

Thanks a lot in advance,
Sonu

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jun 27 2010 - 11:33:47 ART