RE: Eigrp Metrics

It all depends on what you're asked to do. If you just want to
redistribute OSPF routes into EIGRP you can get away with what you say,
yet if any custom K values/operations are requested, then you have to
configure them accordingly. In *many* CCIE/real world cases you don't
have to mess with the K values so just read the question and do exactly
whatever they ask - no points for a fancy config :)

--------------------------
Kambiz Agahian
CCIE (R&S), CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
Technical Instructor
CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
Toll Free: 877-654-2243
International: +1-702-968-5100
Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
FAX: +1-702-446-8012
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nathan Richie
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 1:38 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: RE: Eigrp Metrics

Just be mindful of what else may be required. For instance, in one of
my practice labs, I used all 1s for the K values. Later in the lab I
was required to do some routing manipulation with the variance metric
and by using all 1s, it really jacked what value I needed to use in the
variance command. Looking at the solutions guide, it should similar
values to what you listed and made the variance task much easier.

Hope this helps,

Nathan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mustafa Yadav
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 4:11 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Eigrp Metrics

hi,

In one of lab it is saying perfrom mutual redistribution between eigrp
and
ospf .

For me under eigrp redistibute ospf 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1 is right
answer.but
in lab answer quide it is written 1000 100 255 3 1500.

I know the question is a little bit weird.There must be a reason for
using
these K values.But my question is wheter it is OK for us to use 1 1 1 1
1
or any other values if something is not defined explicitly in the
question?

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 18 2010 - 13:45:16 ART